Utah Code

Utah Code § 61-1-26 (2026)

Scope of the act -- Service of process

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Section 61-1-1, Subsection 61-1-3(1), Sections 61-1-7, 61-1-15.5, 61-1-17, and 61-1-22 apply to persons who sell or offer to sell when:

an offer to sell is made in this state; or

an offer to buy is made and accepted in this state.

Section 61-1-1, Subsection 61-1-3(1), and Section 61-1-17 apply to persons who buy or offer to buy when:

an offer to buy is made in this state; or

an offer to sell is made and accepted in this state.

For the purposes of this section, an offer to sell or to buy is made in this state whether or not either party is then present in this state, when the offer:

originates from this state; or

is directed by the offeror to this state and received at the place to which it is directed, or at any post office in this state in the case of a mailed offer.

For the purposes of this section, an offer to sell or to buy is accepted in this state when acceptance:

is communicated to the offeror in this state; and

has not previously been communicated to the offeror, orally or in writing, outside this state, and acceptance is communicated to the offeror in this state, whether or not either party is then present in this state, when the offeree directs it to the offeror in this state reasonably believing the offeror to be in this state and it is received at the place to which it is directed or at any post office in this state in the case of a mailed acceptance.

An offer to sell or to buy is not made in this state when:

the publisher circulates or there is circulated on his behalf in this state any bona fide newspaper or other publication of general, regular, and paid circulation which is not published in this state, or which is published in this state but has had more than 2/3 of its circulation outside this state during the past 12 months; or

a radio or television program originating outside this state is received in this state.

Section 61-1-2 and Subsection 61-1-3(3), as well as Section 61-1-17 so far as investment advisers are concerned, apply when any act instrumental in effecting prohibited conduct is done in this state, whether or not either party is then present in this state.

Every application for registration under this chapter and every issuer which proposes to offer a security in this state through any person acting on an agency basis in the common-law sense shall file with the division, in such form as it prescribes by rule, an irrevocable consent appointing the division or the director to be his attorney to receive service of any lawful process in any noncriminal suit, action, or proceeding against him or his successor, executor, or administrator which arises under this chapter or any rule or order hereunder after the consent has been filed, with the same force and validity as if served personally on the person filing the consent.

A person who has filed such a consent in connection with a previous registration or notice filing need not file another.

Service may be made by leaving a copy of the process in the office of the division, but it is not effective unless the plaintiff, who may be the division in a suit, action, or proceeding instituted by it, sends notice of the service and a copy of the process by registered mail to the defendant or respondent at his last address on file with the division, and the plaintiff's affidavit of compliance with this subsection is filed in the case on or before the return day of the process, if any, or within such further time as the court allows.

When any person, including any nonresident of this state, engages in conduct prohibited or made actionable by this chapter or any rule or order hereunder, and he has not filed a consent to service of process under Subsection (7) and personal jurisdiction over him cannot otherwise be obtained in this state, that conduct shall be considered equivalent to his appointment of the division or the director to be his attorney to receive service of any lawful process in any noncriminal suit, action, or proceeding against him or his successor executor or administrator which grows out of that conduct and which is brought under this chapter or any rule or order hereunder, with the same force and validity as if served on him personally.

Service may be made by leaving a copy of the process in the office of the division, but it is not effective unless the plaintiff, who may be the division in a suit, action, or proceeding instituted by it, sends notice of the service and a copy of the process by registered mail to the defendant or respondent at his last-known address or takes other steps which are reasonably calculated to give actual notice, and the plaintiff's affidavit of compliance with this subsection is filed in the case on or before the return day of the process, if any, or within such further time as the court allows.

When process is served under this section, the court, or the director shall order such continuance as may be necessary to afford the defendant or respondent reasonable opportunity to defend.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 6 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1938–2026 · leading case: MFS Series Trust III Ex Rel. MFS Mun. High Income Fund v. Grainger, 2004 UT 61 (Utah 2004).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

MFS Series Trust III Ex Rel. MFS Mun. High Income Fund v. Grainger, 2004 UT 61 (Utah 2004). · cites it 2× “Plaintiffs further argue that the statute, in creating liability, confers personal jurisdiction over defendants.”

Chaney v. W. States Title Ins. Co., 292 F. Supp. 376 (D. Utah 1968). · cites it 3× “See Utah Code Ann. § 61-1-26 (Repl. Vol.1968).”

Sunrise Fin., Inc. v. PaineWebber, Inc., 948 F. Supp. 1002 (D. Utah 1996). · cites it 2× “” Utah Code Ann. § 61-1-26 . The complaint asserts that an offer to sell was made by plaintiffs who are Utah entities.”

Piantes v. Hayden-Stone, Inc., 514 P.2d 529 (Utah 1973). · cites it 4× “In the Piantes case jurisdiction was obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 61-1-26(7) of the Utah Uniform Securities Act.”

Dern Inv. Co. v. Carbon Cnty. Land Co., 75 P.2d 660 (Utah 1938). · cites it 2× “Section 61-1-26, R. S. Utah 1933. The preexisting debt owing by the Milner Corporation to John Dern, evidenced by the note of January 24, 1912, would likewise furnish value for the indorsement of said note by the former to the latter.”

Capana Swiss Advisors AG, a Swiss Corp., et al. v. Rymark, a Utah Corp., et al.; Ashley Miron Leshem et al. (D. Utah 2026). · cites it 2× “103 Utah Code Ann. § 61-1-26 (1). 104 Docket No.”

— Utah Code § 61-1-26(7) — 1 case

Piantes v. Hayden-Stone, Inc., 514 P.2d 529 (Utah 1973). “In the Piantes case jurisdiction was obtained pursuant to the provisions of Section 61-1-26(7) of the Utah Uniform Securities Act.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.