Utah Code § 63G-7-101
Title -- Scope of waivers and retentions of immunity
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
This chapter is known as the "Governmental Immunity Act of Utah."
The scope of the waivers and retentions of immunity found in this comprehensive chapter:
applies to all functions of government, no matter how labeled; and
governs all claims against governmental entities or against their employees or agents arising out of the performance of the employee's duties, within the scope of employment, or under color of authority.
A governmental entity and an employee of a governmental entity retain immunity from suit unless that immunity has been expressly waived in this chapter.
A governmental entity and an employee of a governmental entity retain immunity from suit if an injury arises out of or in connection with, or results from, conduct or a condition described in Subsection 63G-7-201(3) or (4), even if immunity from suit for the injury is waived under Section 63G-7-301.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 52
cases (27 in the last 5 years), 2009–2026 · leading case: Craig v. Provo City
Craig v. Provo City (2016)
“” UTAH CODE § 63G-7-101 7 CRAIG v. PROVO CITY Opinion of the Court (2013).”
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Utah State Treasurer (2016)
“It now provides, ‚Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
Salo v. Tyler (2018)
“We hold that the defendants were entitled to summary judgment under the Utah Governmental Immunity Act, Utah Code sections 63G-7-101 through 63G-7-904. That statute protects the governmental employees here from liability for acts within the scope of their employment unless their…”
GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found. (2018)
“The district court certified three questions relating to the interpretation of the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, Utah Code sections 63G-7-101 to 904 (Immunity Act).”
Graves v. Utah County Government (2024)
“¶10 In response, the County, the Commissioners, and Taylor filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted, see Utah R.”
Pinder v. Duchesne (2020)
“The Third District Court dismissed the case for several reasons, but mainly because it believed that the Pinders‘ causes of action were barred by the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah (UGIA), see UTAH CODE §§ 63G-7-101 to -904, and by their applicable statutes of limitations.”
GeoMetWatch v. Behunin (2022)
“3d at 1069 (alterations in original) (quoting Utah Code § 63G-7-101(2)). Thus, “[u]nless immunity is waived by the [UGIA], ‘each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental…”
Mariani v. Driver License Division (2024)
“§ 63G-7-201(1) (“Except as otherwise provided in [the GIA], each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
Mallory v. Brigham Young University (2014)
“See UTAH CODE §§ 63G-7-101 to -904. Under the Act, plaintiffs who have a claim against a governmental employee for acts committed during the performance of the employee’s duties must file a notice of claim within one year after the claim arises, or the claim is barred.”
Thorpe v. Washington City (2010)
“See Utah Code Ann. §§ 63G-7-101 to -904 (2008 & Supp.”
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“II T9 Utah's Governmental Immunity Act, Utah Code §§ 63G-7-101 to -904, at once waives sovereign immunity and carves out express exceptions to those waivers.”
Cunningham v. Weber County (2022)
“See generally UTAH CODE §§ 63G-7-101–904. The act provides that governmental entities ―are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function,‖ id.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-101(2) — 7 cases
GeoMetWatch Corp. v. Utah State Univ. Research Found. (2018)
“The district court certified three questions relating to the interpretation of the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah, Utah Code sections 63G-7-101 to 904 (Immunity Act).”
GeoMetWatch v. Behunin (2022)
“3d at 1069 (alterations in original) (quoting Utah Code § 63G-7-101(2)). Thus, “[u]nless immunity is waived by the [UGIA], ‘each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental…”
Vittoria v. Provo City (2024)
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Utah State Treasurer (2016)
“It now provides, ‚Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
Graves v. Utah County Government (2024)
“¶10 In response, the County, the Commissioners, and Taylor filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted, see Utah R.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-101(2)(a) — 1 case
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Utah State Treasurer (2016)
“It now provides, ‚Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-101(2)(b) — 18 cases
Craig v. Provo City (2016)
“” UTAH CODE § 63G-7-101 7 CRAIG v. PROVO CITY Opinion of the Court (2013).”
Mallory v. Brigham Young University (2014)
“See UTAH CODE §§ 63G-7-101 to -904. Under the Act, plaintiffs who have a claim against a governmental employee for acts committed during the performance of the employee’s duties must file a notice of claim within one year after the claim arises, or the claim is barred.”
Pinder v. Duchesne (2020)
“The Third District Court dismissed the case for several reasons, but mainly because it believed that the Pinders‘ causes of action were barred by the Governmental Immunity Act of Utah (UGIA), see UTAH CODE §§ 63G-7-101 to -904, and by their applicable statutes of limitations.”
Francis v. State (2010)
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Utah State Treasurer (2016)
“It now provides, ‚Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-101(3) — 17 cases
Graves v. Utah County Government (2024)
“¶10 In response, the County, the Commissioners, and Taylor filed a motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim on which relief could be granted, see Utah R.”
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Utah State Treasurer (2016)
“It now provides, ‚Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
Mariani v. Driver License Division (2024)
“§ 63G-7-201(1) (“Except as otherwise provided in [the GIA], each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
Schleger v. State (2018)
Doutre v. Box Elder County (2024)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-101(4) — 5 cases
Mariani v. Driver License Division (2024)
“§ 63G-7-201(1) (“Except as otherwise provided in [the GIA], each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
Cunningham v. Weber County (2022)
“See generally UTAH CODE §§ 63G-7-101–904. The act provides that governmental entities ―are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function,‖ id.”
ARMENTA v. UNIFIED FIRE (2025)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-101(8) — 1 case
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Utah State Treasurer (2016)
“It now provides, ‚Except as otherwise provided in this chapter, each governmental entity and each employee of a governmental entity are immune from suit for any injury that results from the exercise of a governmental function.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.