Utah Code § 63G-7-301
Waivers of immunity
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived as to any contractual obligation.
Actions arising out of contractual rights or obligations are not subject to the requirements of Section 63G-7-401, 63G-7-402, 63G-7-403, or 63G-7-601.
The Division of Water Resources is not liable for failure to deliver water from a reservoir or associated facility authorized by Title 73, Chapter 26, Bear River Development Act, if the failure to deliver the contractual amount of water is due to drought, other natural condition, or safety condition that causes a deficiency in the amount of available water.
Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived:
as to any action brought to recover, obtain possession of, or quiet title to real or personal property;
as to any action brought to foreclose mortgages or other liens on real or personal property, to determine any adverse claim on real or personal property, or to obtain an adjudication about any mortgage or other lien that the governmental entity may have or claim on real or personal property;
as to any action based on the negligent destruction, damage, or loss of goods, merchandise, or other property while it is in the possession of any governmental entity or employee, if the property was seized for the purpose of forfeiture under any provision of state law;
subject to Section 63G-7-302, as to any action brought under the authority of Utah Constitution, Article I, Section 22, for the recovery of compensation from the governmental entity when the governmental entity has taken or damaged private property for public uses without just compensation;
for actual damages under Title 67, Chapter 21, Utah Protection of Public Employees Act;
as to any action brought to obtain relief from a land use regulation that imposes a substantial burden on the free exercise of religion under Title 63L, Chapter 5, Utah Religious Land Use Act;
except as provided in Subsection 63G-7-201(3), as to any injury caused by:
a defective, unsafe, or dangerous condition of any highway, road, street, alley, crosswalk, sidewalk, culvert, tunnel, bridge, viaduct, or other structure located on them; or
any defective or dangerous condition of a public building, structure, dam, reservoir, or other public improvement;
subject to Subsections 63G-7-101(4) and 63G-7-201(4), as to any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment;
notwithstanding Subsection 63G-7-101(4), as to a claim for an injury resulting from a sexual battery, as provided in Section 76-5-418, committed:
against a student of a public elementary or secondary school, including a charter school; and
by an employee of a public elementary or secondary school or charter school who:
at the time of the sexual battery, held a position of special trust, as defined in Section 76-5-404.1, with respect to the student;
is criminally charged in connection with the sexual battery; and
the public elementary or secondary school or charter school knew or in the exercise of reasonable care should have known, at the time of the employee's hiring, to be a sex offender, a kidnap offender, or a child abuse offender as described in Section 53-29-202, required to register under Title 53, Chapter 29, Sex, Kidnap, and Child Abuse Offender Registry, whose status as a sex offender, kidnap offender, or child abuse offender would have been revealed in a background check under Section 53G-11-402;
as to any action brought under Section 78B-6-2303;
as to any action brought to obtain relief under Title 53H, Chapter 7, Part 7, Student Legal Representation;
as to any action brought under Section 53-30-301; and
as to any action or suit brought under Section 20A-19-301 and as to any compensation or expenses awarded under Subsection 20A-19-301(5).
As used in this Subsection (3):
"Code of conduct" means a code of conduct that:
is not less stringent than a model code of conduct, created by the State Board of Education, establishing a professional standard of care for preventing the conduct described in Subsection (3)(a)(i)(D);
is adopted by the applicable local education governing body;
regulates behavior of a school employee toward a student; and
includes a prohibition against any sexual conduct between an employee and a student and against the employee and student sharing any sexually explicit or lewd communication, image, or photograph.
"Local education agency" means:
a school district;
a charter school; or
the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind.
"Local education governing board" means:
for a school district, the local school board;
for a charter school, the charter school governing board; or
for the Utah Schools for the Deaf and the Blind, the state board.
"Public school" means a public elementary or secondary school.
"Sexual abuse" means the offense described in Subsection 76-5-404.1(2).
"Sexual battery" means the offense described in Section 76-5-418, considering the term "child" in that section to include an individual under 18 years old.
Notwithstanding Subsection 63G-7-101(4), immunity from suit is waived as to a claim against a local education agency for an injury resulting from a sexual battery or sexual abuse committed against a student of a public school by a paid employee of the public school who is criminally charged in connection with the sexual battery or sexual abuse, unless:
at the time of the sexual battery or sexual abuse, the public school was subject to a code of conduct; and
before the sexual battery or sexual abuse occurred, the public school had:
provided training on the code of conduct to the employee; and
required the employee to sign a statement acknowledging that the employee has read and understands the code of conduct.
As used in this Subsection (4):
"Institution of higher education" means the same as that term is defined in Section 53H-1-101.
"Policy governing behavior" means a policy adopted by a higher education institution or the Utah Board of Higher Education that:
establishes a professional standard of care for preventing the conduct described in Subsections (4)(a)(ii)(C) and (D);
regulates behavior of a special trust employee toward a subordinate student;
includes a prohibition against any sexual conduct between a special trust employee and a subordinate student; and
includes a prohibition against a special trust employee and subordinate student sharing any sexually explicit or lewd communication, image, or photograph.
"Sexual battery" means the offense described in Section 76-5-418.
"Special trust employee" means an employee of an institution of higher education who is in a position of special trust, as defined in Section 76-5-404.1, with a higher education student.
"Subordinate student" means a student:
of an institution of higher education; and
whose educational opportunities could be adversely impacted by a special trust employee.
Notwithstanding Subsection 63G-7-101(4), immunity from suit is waived as to a claim for an injury resulting from a sexual battery committed against a subordinate student by a special trust employee, unless:
the institution of higher education proves that the special trust employee's behavior that otherwise would constitute a sexual battery was:
with a subordinate student who was at least 18 years old at the time of the behavior; and
with the student's consent; or
at the time of the sexual battery, the institution of higher education was subject to a policy governing behavior; and
before the sexual battery occurred, the higher education institution had taken steps to implement and enforce the policy governing behavior.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 69
cases (23 in the last 5 years), 2009–2026 · leading case: True v. Utah Department of Transportation
True v. Utah Department of Transportation (2018)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2008) (stating that “[i]mmunity from suit .”
Miller v. West Valley City (2017)
“The court determined dismissal was appropriate because Miller had not demonstrated that governmental immunity was waived.”
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
Francis v. State, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (2013)
“58 See UTAH CODE § 63G-7-301(1)–(3), (4). 59 See id. § 63G-7-301(5).”
Francis v. State (2010)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) ("Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived as to any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment.”
Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp. (2010)
“Specifically, Utah Code section 63G-7-301(3)(a)(ii) permits government entities to be sued for injuries caused by "any defective or dangerous condition of a public building, structure, dam, reservoir, or other public improvement.”
Thayer v. Washington County School District (2012)
“See Urax CopE § 63G-7-301(4). With this provision in mind, I agree with the majority's limiting construction of the statute in one respect: The "approvals" and "authorizations" that trigger immunity cannot extend to internal, operational consent given by a government employer…”
Kerr v. City of Salt Lake (2013)
“” Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(a)(i). ¶ 16 When interpreting statutes, “we must give effect to every provision of a statute and avoid an interpretation that will render portions of a statute inoperative.”
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Utah State Treasurer (2016)
“In contrast, section 63G-7-301 addresses a much broader range of potential actions, including any action to recover or obtain possession of personal property.”
Larsen v. Davis County School District (2017)
“§ 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2011). The District, for its part, directs us to the next statutory provision, subsection (5), which contains an exception to the negligence waiver: Immunity from suit .”
Francis v. State (2013)
“58 See UTAH CODE § 63G-7-301(1)–(3), (4). 59 See id. § 63G-7-301(5).”
Graves v. Utah County Government (2024)
“Section 63G-7-301 of the UGIA lists the express waivers of immunity, and Graves has not pointed to any that apply.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(1) — 6 cases
Cabaness v. Thomas (2010)
Francis v. State, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (2013)
“58 See UTAH CODE § 63G-7-301(1)–(3), (4). 59 See id. § 63G-7-301(5).”
Francis v. State (2013)
“58 See UTAH CODE § 63G-7-301(1)–(3), (4). 59 See id. § 63G-7-301(5).”
Francis v. State (2013)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(1)(a) — 4 cases
Doyle v. Lehi City (2012)
Plumb v. University of Utah (2020)
Plumb v. University of Utah (2020)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(1)(b) — 2 cases
Doyle v. Lehi City (2012)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(1)(c) — 1 case
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(2)(a) — 5 cases
Asset Acceptance LLC v. Utah State Treasurer (2016)
“In contrast, section 63G-7-301 addresses a much broader range of potential actions, including any action to recover or obtain possession of personal property.”
Pinder v. Duchesne (2020)
Pinder v. Mitchell (2016)
Andrews v. Spencer (2021)
Seymour v. Perkins (2022)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(2)(d) — 2 cases
Exotic Smoke and Vape v. Cox (2022)
Jonsson v. PacifiCorp (2025)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(2)(f) — 2 cases
McGraw v. University of Utah (2019)
Pead v. Ephraim City (2020)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(2)(h)(i) — 2 cases
Doutre v. Box Elder County (2024)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(2)(i) — 16 cases
Cunningham v. Weber County (2022)
Graves v. Utah County Government (2024)
“Section 63G-7-301 of the UGIA lists the express waivers of immunity, and Graves has not pointed to any that apply.”
Miller v. State of Utah (2016)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(2)(j) — 1 case
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3) — 2 cases
iMatter Utah v. Njord (2014)
Glaittli v. State of Utah (2014)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(a) — 1 case
Miller v. West Valley City (2017)
“The court determined dismissal was appropriate because Miller had not demonstrated that governmental immunity was waived.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(a)(1) — 1 case
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(a)(i) — 2 cases
Kerr v. City of Salt Lake (2013)
“” Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(a)(i). ¶ 16 When interpreting statutes, “we must give effect to every provision of a statute and avoid an interpretation that will render portions of a statute inoperative.”
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(a)(ii) — 3 cases
Miller v. West Valley City (2017)
“The court determined dismissal was appropriate because Miller had not demonstrated that governmental immunity was waived.”
Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp. (2010)
“Specifically, Utah Code section 63G-7-301(3)(a)(ii) permits government entities to be sued for injuries caused by "any defective or dangerous condition of a public building, structure, dam, reservoir, or other public improvement.”
Glaittli v. State of Utah (2014)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(b) — 2 cases
Miller v. West Valley City (2017)
“The court determined dismissal was appropriate because Miller had not demonstrated that governmental immunity was waived.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(b)(ii) — 1 case
Miller v. West Valley City (2017)
“The court determined dismissal was appropriate because Miller had not demonstrated that governmental immunity was waived.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(4) — 14 cases
True v. Utah Department of Transportation (2018)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2008) (stating that “[i]mmunity from suit .”
Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp. (2010)
“Specifically, Utah Code section 63G-7-301(3)(a)(ii) permits government entities to be sued for injuries caused by "any defective or dangerous condition of a public building, structure, dam, reservoir, or other public improvement.”
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
Miller v. West Valley City (2017)
“The court determined dismissal was appropriate because Miller had not demonstrated that governmental immunity was waived.”
Francis v. State (2010)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) ("Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived as to any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5) — 10 cases
True v. Utah Department of Transportation (2018)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2008) (stating that “[i]mmunity from suit .”
Bingham v. Roosevelt City Corp. (2010)
“Specifically, Utah Code section 63G-7-301(3)(a)(ii) permits government entities to be sued for injuries caused by "any defective or dangerous condition of a public building, structure, dam, reservoir, or other public improvement.”
Francis v. State, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (2013)
“58 See UTAH CODE § 63G-7-301(1)–(3), (4). 59 See id. § 63G-7-301(5).”
Larsen v. Davis County School District (2017)
“§ 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2011). The District, for its part, directs us to the next statutory provision, subsection (5), which contains an exception to the negligence waiver: Immunity from suit .”
iMatter Utah v. Njord (2014)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(8) — 1 case
Van De Grift v. State (2013)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(F) — 1 case
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(a) — 2 cases
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
Kerr v. City of Salt Lake (2013)
“” Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(a)(i). ¶ 16 When interpreting statutes, “we must give effect to every provision of a statute and avoid an interpretation that will render portions of a statute inoperative.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(b) — 5 cases
Van De Grift v. State (2013)
Francis v. State (2010)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) ("Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived as to any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment.”
Thayer v. Washington County School District (2012)
“See Urax CopE § 63G-7-301(4). With this provision in mind, I agree with the majority's limiting construction of the statute in one respect: The "approvals" and "authorizations" that trigger immunity cannot extend to internal, operational consent given by a government employer…”
Larsen v. Davis County School District (2017)
“§ 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2011). The District, for its part, directs us to the next statutory provision, subsection (5), which contains an exception to the negligence waiver: Immunity from suit .”
Petersen v. RIVERTON CITY (2011)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(c) — 9 cases
True v. Utah Department of Transportation (2018)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2008) (stating that “[i]mmunity from suit .”
Francis v. State (2010)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) ("Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived as to any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment.”
Thayer v. Washington County School District (2012)
“See Urax CopE § 63G-7-301(4). With this provision in mind, I agree with the majority's limiting construction of the statute in one respect: The "approvals" and "authorizations" that trigger immunity cannot extend to internal, operational consent given by a government employer…”
Francis v. State, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (2013)
“58 See UTAH CODE § 63G-7-301(1)–(3), (4). 59 See id. § 63G-7-301(5).”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(d) — 1 case
True v. Utah Department of Transportation (2018)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2008) (stating that “[i]mmunity from suit .”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(e) — 1 case
Larsen v. Davis County School District (2017)
“§ 63G-7-301(4) (LexisNexis 2011). The District, for its part, directs us to the next statutory provision, subsection (5), which contains an exception to the negligence waiver: Immunity from suit .”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(j) — 3 cases
Francis v. State (2010)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) ("Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived as to any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(k) — 6 cases
Francis v. State, Utah Division of Wildlife Resources (2013)
“58 See UTAH CODE § 63G-7-301(1)–(3), (4). 59 See id. § 63G-7-301(5).”
Francis v. State (2013)
“58 See UTAH CODE § 63G-7-301(1)–(3), (4). 59 See id. § 63G-7-301(5).”
Francis v. State (2010)
“See Utah Code Ann. § 63G-7-301(4) ("Immunity from suit of each governmental entity is waived as to any injury proximately caused by a negligent act or omission of an employee committed within the scope of employment.”
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
Francis v. State (2013)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(p) — 1 case
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(q) — 1 case
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(5)(u) — 1 case
Van De Grift v. State (2013)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(8)(a) — 1 case
Glaittli v. State (2013)
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(a) — 1 case
Miller v. West Valley City (2017)
“The court determined dismissal was appropriate because Miller had not demonstrated that governmental immunity was waived.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(a)(i) — 1 case
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(a)(ii) — 1 case
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(b)(q) — 1 case
Barneck v. Utah Department of Transportation (2015)
“§ 63G-7-301(1)(c) (retaining immunity for injuries caused by the Division of Water Resources' failure to deliver water when it is due to a "natural condition"); id.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(l) — 1 case
Kerr v. City of Salt Lake (2013)
“” Utah Code § 63G-7-301(3)(a)(i). ¶ 16 When interpreting statutes, “we must give effect to every provision of a statute and avoid an interpretation that will render portions of a statute inoperative.”
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(l)(a) — 1 case
— Utah Code § 63G-7-301(l)(b) — 1 case
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.