Utah Code
Utah Code § 76-4-201 (2026)
Conspiracy -- Elements of offense
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
UT-LEGle.utah.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
For purposes of this part a person is guilty of conspiracy when he, intending that conduct constituting a crime be performed, agrees with one or more persons to engage in or cause the performance of the conduct and any one of them commits an overt act in pursuance of the conspiracy, except where the offense is a capital felony, a felony against the person, arson, burglary, or robbery, the overt act is not required for the commission of conspiracy.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13
cases, 1984–2020 · leading case: State v. Green, 2005 UT 9 (Utah 2005).
State v. Green, 2005 UT 9 (Utah 2005). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 (providing the elements of a conspiracy).”
United States v. Taison McCollum, 885 F.3d 300 (4th Cir. 2018). “§ 2C:5-2(d); Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 ). 24 The bond between statutory usages and common law, so basic also to American law, has been too casually broken.”
State v. Leonard, 825 P.2d 664 (Utah Ct. App. 1991). “§ 58 -37C-8 (1990), and for conspiracy to manufacture a controlled substance, a third degree felony, in violation of Utah Code Ann. §§ 76-4-201 (1990) and 58-37-8 (1990).”
United States v. Luciano Pascacio-Rodriguez, 749 F.3d 353 (5th Cir. 2014). “§ 2C:5-2(d) (West 2013); Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 (West 2013). 61 .”
Israel Pagan Est. v. Cannon, 746 P.2d 785 (Utah Ct. App. 1987). “The criminal conspiracy statute, Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 (1987), requires a showing of substantially similar elements: (1) intention that the conduct constituting a crime be performed, (2) agreement between two or more persons to engage in or cause the criminal conduct, and…”
State v. Chaney, 1999 UT App 309 (Utah Ct. App. 1999). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 (1995) (providing in relevant part: “a person is guilty of conspiracy when he, intending that conduct constituting a crime be performed”); id.”
State v. Ansari, 2004 UT App 326 (Utah Ct. App. 2004). “§ 76-4-201 (2003). In contrast, section 76-4-401 does not require “overt” or “strongly corroborative evidence.”
State v. Rust, 2017 UT App 176 (Utah Ct. App. 2017). “See Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 (LexisNexis 2012); id.”
State v. Miller, 677 P.2d 1129 (Utah 1984). “, 1953, § 76-4-201. Dr. Madsen should have been allowed to testify *1132 that Miller suffered from a mental condition that resulted in manifestations of a vivid and overactive imagination.”
United States v. Xochitl Garcia-Santana, 743 F.3d 666 (9th Cir. 2014). “02 (d); Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 ; Vt. Stat. Ann.”
Garcia v. Holder, Jr., 440 F. App'x 660 (10th Cir. 2011). “3d at 1210 , is also present in Utah’s conspiracy statute, Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 . In particular, “[ijnter-dependence is established when each co-conspirators’ actions are necessary to accomplish a common, illicit goal.”
United States v. Xochitl Garcia-Santana, 774 F.3d 528 (2014). “02 (d); Utah Code Ann. § 76-4-201 ; Vt. Stat. Ann.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.