Utah Code » Title 78A, Chapter 7 — Justice Court; part 78A-7-2 — Judges and Administration
Utah Code

Utah Code § 78A-7-201 (2026)

Justice court judge eligibility -- Mandatory retirement

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section UT-LEGle.utah.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A justice court judge shall be:
a citizen of the United States;
25 years old or older;
a resident of Utah for at least three years immediately preceding the judge's appointment;
upon appointment or within a reasonable time after appointment, a resident of the county, an adjacent county, or the judicial district in which the justice court is located; and
a qualified voter of the county in which the judge resides.
On and after May 3, 2023, a justice court judge shall have a degree from a law school that makes one eligible to apply for admission to a bar in any state.
A justice court judge holding office on May 3, 2023, who does not meet the qualification described in Subsection (2)(a) may continue in office until the judge resigns, retires, is not retained in a retention election, or is removed from office.
Notwithstanding Subsection (2), a justice court judge is not required to be admitted to practice law in the state as a qualification to hold office.
A justice court judge shall be a person who has demonstrated maturity of judgment, integrity, and the ability to understand and apply appropriate law with impartiality.
A justice court judge shall retire upon attaining the age of 75 years.
If there are not at least two applicants for a justice court judge position who meet the requirement of Subsection (2)(a), the justice court nominating commission may:
re-advertise the position; and
accept applications from individuals who do not meet the requirement of Subsection (2)(a).
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2013 · leading case: Herbert W. Lux, s/k/a Herbert W. Lux, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Herbert W. Lux, s/k/a Herbert W. Lux, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. Ct. App. 2013). “Based on the foregoing principles of statutory and constitutional interpretation, we conclude that the trial court did not err when it ruled that Judge Shaw, who took the oath of office at the commencement of his term of service to the Commonwealth, and whose oath of office…”
Herbert W. Lux, s/k/a Herbert W. Lux, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia (Va. Ct. App. 2013). “Based on the foregoing principles of statutory and constitutional interpretation, we conclude that the trial court did not err when it ruled that Judge Shaw, who took the oath of office at the commencement of his term of service to the Commonwealth, and whose oath of office…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.