Kelly v. Alpstetten Ass'n, 296 A.2d 232 (Vt. 1972). · cites it 7דHis motion was predicated on the provisions of 4 V.S.A. § 119: “Whenever the presiding judge or the judges of a county court have begun the hearing of a cause on its merits at a stated term thereof or in vacation after a stated term, he or they may finish such hearing and render…”
DeGrace v. DeGrace, 520 A.2d 987 (Vt. 1986). “Turning to the issues presented by the divorce decree itself, we first address plaintiffs claim of error with regard to the maintenance award.”
Pabst v. Lathrop, 376 A.2d 49 (Vt. 1977). · cites it 6ד6(c) and not by 4 V.S.A. § 119 as construed by this Court in Blair v.”
Lafko v. Lafko, 256 A.2d 166 (Vt. 1969). “However, this limitation was enlarged the following year by the enactment of 4 V.S.A. §119 (1929, No. 40 §2) to provide: Whenever the presiding judge or the judges of a county court have begun the hearing of a cause on its merits at a stated term thereof or in vacation after a…”
Blair v. Cohen, 163 A.2d 843 (Vt. 1960). · cites it 3דThe defendant challenges the judgment on the ground that the action of the assistant judges is contrary to the provisions of 4 V.S.A. §119: *84 “Whenever the presiding judge or the judges of a County Court have begun the hearing of a cause on its merits at a stated term thereof…”
B-W Acceptance Corp. v. Twin State Elec. Supply Co., 238 A.2d 663 (Vt. 1968). “Apparently, by operation of 4 V.S.A. §119, no findings of fact were made by the trial court and no judgment order has issued.”
In re Foy, 518 A.2d 372 (Vt. 1986). “§ 111(a) (subsequently amended; now see 4 V.S.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.