Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2291 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : VOIDABLE TRANSACTIONS

(Cite as: 9 V.S.A. § 2291)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2014–2024 · leading case: Canney v. Fisher & Strattner, LLC (In re Turner & Cook, Inc.), 507 B.R. 101 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2014).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Canney v. Fisher & Strattner, LLC (In re Turner & Cook, Inc.), 507 B.R. 101 (Bankr. D. Vt. 2014). “A trustee may avoid and recover constructive fraudulent transfers made within four years of the petition date if acting pursuant to Vermont law, and within two years if acting pursuant to federal law.”
porter v. stafford (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “” 9 V.S.A. § 2291(a)(1); see also id. § 2292(a) (“A transfer or obligation is not voidable under subdivision 2288(a)(1) of this title against a person who took in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value or against any subsequent transferee or obligee.”
Porter v. Stafford (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “” 9 V.S.A. § 2291(a)(1); see also id. § 2292(a) (“A transfer or obligation is not voidable under subdivision 2288(a)(1) of this title against a person who took in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value or against any subsequent transferee or obligee.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 09, § 2291(a)(1) — 2 cases
porter v. stafford (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024). “” 9 V.S.A. § 2291(a)(1); see also id. § 2292(a) (“A transfer or obligation is not voidable under subdivision 2288(a)(1) of this title against a person who took in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value or against any subsequent transferee or obligee.”
Porter v. Stafford (Vt. Super. Ct. 2019). “” 9 V.S.A. § 2291(a)(1); see also id. § 2292(a) (“A transfer or obligation is not voidable under subdivision 2288(a)(1) of this title against a person who took in good faith and for a reasonably equivalent value or against any subsequent transferee or obligee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.