Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 10 Chapter 151
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6084 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : PERMITS

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6084)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (2 in the last 5 years), 1972–2026 · leading case: In Re White, 779 A.2d 1264 (Vt. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re White, 779 A.2d 1264 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 4× “We concluded that this was not the exercise of discretion regarding whether to provide personal notice to adjoining landowners contemplated by 10 V.S.A. § 6084 and the Board's own Rule 10(F), but rather was an impermissible delegation of discretion to the applicants themselves.”
In re Great Waters of Am., Inc., 435 A.2d 956 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 8× “§ 6084(a) notice requirements, and the district commission, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6084 (b), forwarded notice and a copy *107 of the application to the Environmental Board and other state agencies.”
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). · cites it 4× “The Mount Holly and Weston Town Planning Commissions both appeared at the District Commission hearings on criteria (9) and (10), their presence as parties provided for in 10 V.S.A. § 6084(a) and § 6085(c). Wildlife questions the standing of the planning commissions at board…”
In re Mathez Act 250 LU Permit (Sung-Hee Chung, Appellant), 192 A.3d 400 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 2× “See 10 V.S.A. § 6084 (describing different application processes for "major" and "minor" applications).”
Comm. to Save Bishop's House v. Med. Ctr. Hosp. of Vermont, Inc., 388 A.2d 827 (Vt. 1978). · cites it 2× “Rule 4 requires that notice of a petition for declaratory ruling be given to all parties listed in 10 V.S.A. § 6084. These so-called Section 6084 parties include the municipality, the municipal planning commissions and the regional planning commission wherein the land is located.”
In Re Agency of Admin., Etc., 444 A.2d 1349 (Vt. 1982). “10 V.S.A. § 6084. At the request of anyone required to receive notice, any adjoining property owner, or any other person authorized by Board rule, a hearing on the application for a permit must be held.”
In Re Killington, Ltd., 616 A.2d 241 (Vt. 1992). “Shrewsbury petitioned the Board to be admitted either as a statutory party, under 10 V.S.A. §§ 6084(a), 6085(c), or as a permitted party, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(B)(2), on the ground that such admission would materially assist the Board in its proceedings.”
In Re Lunde Constr. Co., 428 A.2d 1140 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 4× “The litigants agree that Barre City is not entitled to party status as of right under 10 V.S.A. § 6084(a). Section 6084(a) gives party status to the municipality in which the proposed development is to be located, and to adjacent municipalities if the development is on a…”
Application of Great E. Bldg. Co., Inc., 326 A.2d 152 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 3× “According to 10 V.S.A. § 6084(a), the appellants fall outside the ambit of those designated to receive the notice referred to in 10 V.”
In Re Preseault, 292 A.2d 832 (Vt. 1972). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6084. At the request of some eighteen adjoining property owners, who objected to the issuance of the environmental permit sought by the Preseaults, the District Commission held hear *345 ings on the application at four separate sessions.”
In Re Conway, 567 A.2d 1145 (Vt. 1989). ““Minor applications” are governed by Environmental Board Rule 51, which provides for published notice and written notice under 10 V.S.A. § 6084. The statute provides in pertinent part: *529 (a) On or before the date of filing of application the applicant shall send notice and a…”
Auclair v. Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 329 A.2d 641 (Vt. 1974). “Moreover, the State Land Use and Development Act which provides notice and party status for adjoining property owners who request a hearing, 10 V.S.A. § 6084(b) and § 6085(c), specifically exempts from its effect the electric generation and transmission facilities requiring…”
Show all 21 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6084(a) — 9 cases
In re Great Waters of Am., Inc., 435 A.2d 956 (Vt. 1981). “§ 6084(a) notice requirements, and the district commission, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6084 (b), forwarded notice and a copy *107 of the application to the Environmental Board and other state agencies.”
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “The Mount Holly and Weston Town Planning Commissions both appeared at the District Commission hearings on criteria (9) and (10), their presence as parties provided for in 10 V.S.A. § 6084(a) and § 6085(c). Wildlife questions the standing of the planning commissions at board…”
In Re Killington, Ltd., 616 A.2d 241 (Vt. 1992). “Shrewsbury petitioned the Board to be admitted either as a statutory party, under 10 V.S.A. §§ 6084(a), 6085(c), or as a permitted party, pursuant to Environmental Board Rule 14(B)(2), on the ground that such admission would materially assist the Board in its proceedings.”
Comm. to Save Bishop's House v. Med. Ctr. Hosp. of Vermont, Inc., 388 A.2d 827 (Vt. 1978). “Rule 4 requires that notice of a petition for declaratory ruling be given to all parties listed in 10 V.S.A. § 6084. These so-called Section 6084 parties include the municipality, the municipal planning commissions and the regional planning commission wherein the land is located.”
Application of Great E. Bldg. Co., Inc., 326 A.2d 152 (Vt. 1974). “According to 10 V.S.A. § 6084(a), the appellants fall outside the ambit of those designated to receive the notice referred to in 10 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6084(b) — 6 cases
In Re White, 779 A.2d 1264 (Vt. 2001). “We concluded that this was not the exercise of discretion regarding whether to provide personal notice to adjoining landowners contemplated by 10 V.S.A. § 6084 and the Board's own Rule 10(F), but rather was an impermissible delegation of discretion to the applicants themselves.”
In Re Wildlife Wonderland, Inc., 346 A.2d 645 (Vt. 1975). “The Mount Holly and Weston Town Planning Commissions both appeared at the District Commission hearings on criteria (9) and (10), their presence as parties provided for in 10 V.S.A. § 6084(a) and § 6085(c). Wildlife questions the standing of the planning commissions at board…”
In Re Lunde Constr. Co., 428 A.2d 1140 (Vt. 1981). “The litigants agree that Barre City is not entitled to party status as of right under 10 V.S.A. § 6084(a). Section 6084(a) gives party status to the municipality in which the proposed development is to be located, and to adjacent municipalities if the development is on a…”
In re Great Waters of Am., Inc., 435 A.2d 956 (Vt. 1981). “§ 6084(a) notice requirements, and the district commission, pursuant to 10 V.S.A. § 6084 (b), forwarded notice and a copy *107 of the application to the Environmental Board and other state agencies.”
Auclair v. Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc., 329 A.2d 641 (Vt. 1974). “Moreover, the State Land Use and Development Act which provides notice and party status for adjoining property owners who request a hearing, 10 V.S.A. § 6084(b) and § 6085(c), specifically exempts from its effect the electric generation and transmission facilities requiring…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6084(b)(2) — 1 case
In re Mathez Act 250 LU Permit (Sung-Hee Chung, Appellant), 192 A.3d 400 (Vt. 2018). “See 10 V.S.A. § 6084 (describing different application processes for "major" and "minor" applications).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6084(e)(2) — 2 cases
Tyler Bridge Road Permit Amendment Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2025).
Tyler Bridge Road Permit Amendment Application - Decision on Motion (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.