Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6501 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : RADIOACTIVE WASTE FACILITY SITING

(Cite as: 10 V.S.A. § 6501)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 2010–2013 · leading case: Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, 683 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, 683 F.3d 1330 (Fed. Cir. 2012). · cites it 4× “” Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6501 (1982). Vermont Yankee enjoyed a company-specific statutory exemption for the “temporary storage .”
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 160 (Fed. Cl. 2010). · cites it 2× “A § 248 (1969); 10 V.S.A. § 6501 (1979). Taken together, DOE should have reasonably foreseen at the time of contracting that state or local costs might be imposed on nuclear utilities such as the VYNPS, regardless of its owner.”
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin, 733 F.3d 393 (2d Cir. 2013). “” Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6501 (a). However, two years later, in 1979, the Vermont Legislature *400 enacted an “exemption” provision stating that the requirements imposed by § 6501 do “not apply to any temporary storage by Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corporation of spent…”
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. Shumlin, 838 F. Supp. 2d 183 (D. Vt. 2012). · cites it 2× “Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6501 . 9 A later-enacted “Exemption” provision, however, carved out an exception to this requirement, without expressly repealing or abrogating section 6501, and provided subchapter 1 did “not apply to any temporary storage by Vermont Yankee Nuclear…”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 10, § 6501(a) — 1 case
Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC v. United States, 95 Fed. Cl. 160 (Fed. Cl. 2010). “A § 248 (1969); 10 V.S.A. § 6501 (1979). Taken together, DOE should have reasonably foreseen at the time of contracting that state or local costs might be imposed on nuclear utilities such as the VYNPS, regardless of its owner.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.