Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 13 Chapter 19
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1030 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 004 : OTHER DISTURBANCES OF THE PEACE

(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 1030)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 29 cases (6 in the last 5 years), 1996–2026 · leading case: State v. Mott, 692 A.2d 360 (Vt. 1997).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State v. Mott, 692 A.2d 360 (Vt. 1997). · cites it 5× “Defendant Joseph Mott appeals his district court conviction for violating an abuse prevention order, see 13 V.S.A. § 1030, and separately appeals from the family court’s denial of his motion for relief from the same abuse prevention order.”
United States v. Juan Castillo-Rivera, 853 F.3d 218 (5th Cir. 2017). “Violent crime, as defined in Vt. Stat. Ann. tit 13 § 4017, includes violation of abuse prevention order under Vt.”
State v. Waters, 2013 VT 109 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 3× “” 13 V.S.A. § 1030(a). The court’s order that defendant “shall not threaten or harass plaintiff’ informed him that threats and harassment are separate acts and that harassment need not include a threat.”
In re D.F., H.F., M.F. & D.F., Juveniles, 204 A.3d 641 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 2× “A person who intentionally violates such an order concerning contact between the child and that person is subject to punishment pursuant to 13 V.S.A. § 1030, the statute that applies to violations of abuse-prevention orders.”
State v. Brillon, 2010 VT 25 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 2× “Dunbar, we construed the felony for violating an abuse-prevention order based on second offense, 13 V.S.A. § 1030(b), as an enhanced penalty provision, and endorsed use of a bifurcated trial to determine the validity of the enhancement.”
State v. Carpenter, 2013 VT 28 (Vt. 2013). · cites it 4× “13 V.S.A. § 1030(b). The State argues that (1) the plain language of the Habitual Offender Act permits a minimum sentence greater than the statutory maximum of the underlying offense, (2) a contrary interpretation of § 11 would produce irrational and absurd results, and (3)…”
State v. Prior, 917 A.2d 466 (Vt. 2007). · cites it 3× “See 13 V.S.A. § 1030 (violation of abuse prevention order (VAPO)); id.”
Fox v. Fox, 2014 VT 100 (Vt. 2014). “It prohibits him from engaging in behavior that would be entirely legal but for the court’s order.”
Russin v. Wesson, 2008 VT 22 (Vt. 2008). “Plaintiff was charged with two counts of violating the abuse-prevention order (VAPO), 13 V.S.A. § 1030, and ultimately pled no contest to one count; the other count was dismissed.”
State v. Malshuk, 2004 VT 54 (Vt. 2004). “13 V.S.A. § 1030(b). In the first trial, the jury was instructed that “following” meant “to go after, to proceed after or to come after, to pursue in an effort to overtake.”
State v. Dunbar, 772 A.2d 533 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 2× “Defendant Jeffrey Dunbar appeals from a felony conviction for a second offense of violating an abuse prevention order under 13 V.S.A § 1030 in the Caledonia District Court.”
State v. David Downing, 2020 VT 101 (Vt. 2020). “§ 3701(c), violation of an abuse-prevention order under 13 V.S.A. § 1030(a), and aggravated assault under 13 V.”
Show all 29 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1030(a) — 14 cases
State v. Waters, 2013 VT 109 (Vt. 2013). “” 13 V.S.A. § 1030(a). The court’s order that defendant “shall not threaten or harass plaintiff’ informed him that threats and harassment are separate acts and that harassment need not include a threat.”
State v. Mott, 692 A.2d 360 (Vt. 1997). “Defendant Joseph Mott appeals his district court conviction for violating an abuse prevention order, see 13 V.S.A. § 1030, and separately appeals from the family court’s denial of his motion for relief from the same abuse prevention order.”
Fox v. Fox, 2014 VT 100 (Vt. 2014). “It prohibits him from engaging in behavior that would be entirely legal but for the court’s order.”
State v. David Downing, 2020 VT 101 (Vt. 2020). “§ 3701(c), violation of an abuse-prevention order under 13 V.S.A. § 1030(a), and aggravated assault under 13 V.”
State v. Campbell, 2014 VT 123 (Vt. 2014).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 1030(b) — 8 cases
State v. Brillon, 2010 VT 25 (Vt. 2010). “Dunbar, we construed the felony for violating an abuse-prevention order based on second offense, 13 V.S.A. § 1030(b), as an enhanced penalty provision, and endorsed use of a bifurcated trial to determine the validity of the enhancement.”
State v. Carpenter, 2013 VT 28 (Vt. 2013). “13 V.S.A. § 1030(b). The State argues that (1) the plain language of the Habitual Offender Act permits a minimum sentence greater than the statutory maximum of the underlying offense, (2) a contrary interpretation of § 11 would produce irrational and absurd results, and (3)…”
State v. Waters, 2013 VT 109 (Vt. 2013). “” 13 V.S.A. § 1030(a). The court’s order that defendant “shall not threaten or harass plaintiff’ informed him that threats and harassment are separate acts and that harassment need not include a threat.”
State v. Malshuk, 2004 VT 54 (Vt. 2004). “13 V.S.A. § 1030(b). In the first trial, the jury was instructed that “following” meant “to go after, to proceed after or to come after, to pursue in an effort to overtake.”
State v. Dunbar, 772 A.2d 533 (Vt. 2001). “Defendant Jeffrey Dunbar appeals from a felony conviction for a second offense of violating an abuse prevention order under 13 V.S.A § 1030 in the Caledonia District Court.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.