(a) Except as otherwise provided in 18 V.S.A. § 4253, a person who carries a dangerous or deadly weapon, openly or concealed, while committing
a felony shall be imprisoned not more than five years or fined not more than $500.00,
or both.
(b)(1) Carrying a firearm while committing a felony in violation of this section may be considered
a violent act for the purposes of determining whether a person is eligible for bail
under section 7553a of this title.
(2) An offense that is a felony rather than a misdemeanor solely because of the monetary
value of the property involved shall not be considered a violent act under this subsection. (Amended 1967, No. 296 (Adj. Sess.), § 1, eff. March 20, 1968; 2011, No. 121 (Adj. Sess.), § 4, eff. May 9, 2012; 2023, No. 23, § 8, eff. May 30, 2023.)
State v. Kerr, 470 A.2d 670 (Vt. 1983). · cites it 2ד357 magnum handgun) while committing a felony, against the strictures of 13 V.S.A. § 4005. He instituted a timely appeal to this Court; we affirm the conviction.”
State v. Smith, 485 A.2d 124 (Vt. 1984). “§ 3252, and of carrying a weapon openly while committing a felony, 13 V.S.A. § 4005. He appeals from the judgment of the District Court of Vermont, Unit No.”
State v. Audette, 543 A.2d 1315 (Vt. 1988). “First, possession of a deadly weapon while committing a felony, 13 V.S.A. § 4005, is not a crime having its roots in the common law.”
State v. Hurley, 552 A.2d 382 (Vt. 1988). “Defendant argues from the special case of 13 V.S.A. § 4005 as interpreted by State v.”
State v. Carter, 593 A.2d 88 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 2דDefendant contends next that he should have been acquitted of the weapons offense because 13 V.S.A. § 4005 requires a “relationship” between the underlying felony and the carrying of the weapon and the record is devoid of evidence of such relationship.”
State v. Denzel Lafayette, 2021 VT 38 (Vt. 2021). “§ 2827(a), and carrying a dangerous weapon while committing a felony, 13 V.S.A. § 4005. That same day, an arrest warrant was issued.”
State v. Day, 549 A.2d 1061 (1988). “Thus, it does not require an assumption that some element of *123 mens rea is required.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.