Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 13 Chapter 229
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7559 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 13 V.S.A. § 7559)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 21 cases (5 in the last 5 years), 1979–2026 · leading case: In Re Miller, 2009 VT 36 (Vt. 2009).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Miller, 2009 VT 36 (Vt. 2009). · cites it 20× “The trial court's construction of the act, entirely consistent with legislative intent evinced by the chronology and context of its earlier expression and later amendment, is overruled based, in part, on inapposite snippets of legislative history.”
State v. Brillon, 2010 VT 25 (Vt. 2010). · cites it 2× “The police were called, and defendant was arrested, *560 charged with felony second-degree aggravated domestic assault and contempt of court based on a violation of a condition of release, 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e). The aggravated domestic assault felony was also charged as a…”
State v. Ashley, 632 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 3× “Similarly, the State argues that the separate penalty provisions of 13 V.S.A. § 7559(d) (penalty for failure to appear) and § 7559(e) (penalty for violation of condition of release) reflect an intent that a condition of release may be violated even if the defendant is not…”
State v. Malik A. Pratt, 2017 VT 9 (Vt. 2017). “§ 1201(c)(1), three misdemeanor counts of violating conditions of release, 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e), and two misdemeanor counts of buying, receiving, selling, possessing, or concealing stolen property, 13 V.”
State v. Fleurie, 2008 VT 118 (Vt. 2008). “1 The underage-drinking charge, along with a violation-of-eonditions-of-release charge, see 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e), were later dropped. 2 In State v.”
State v. Tester, 2006 VT 24 (Vt. 2006). “1 The State also initially charged defendant with a violation of conditions of release under 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e), but dismissed this charge before trial.”
State v. Washington, 691 A.2d 583 (Vt. 1997). “13 VS.A. § 7559(e). He contends that a mistrial should have been ordered because of the misconduct of a juror, or, alternatively, that judgments of acquittal should have been entered for insufficient evidence.”
State v. Washington, 691 A.2d 583 (Vt. 1997). “He contends that a mistrial should have been ordered because of the misconduct of a juror, or, alternatively, that judgments of acquittal should have been entered for insufficient evidence. We affirm. At the time of the offenses, defendant lived in St.”
In Re Zera, 406 A.2d 396 (Vt. 1979). “He could not have been released from the district court’s order remanding him to the Commissioner of Corrections until the conditions imposed were either complied with or amended, 13 V.S.A. § 7559(a), and thus his continued custody, even absent a written mittimus, was in part…”
State v. Brent Dean Booker, Jr., 2020 VT 67 (Vt. 2020). · cites it 4× “The next day, defendant allegedly violated these conditions, resulting in four misdemeanor charges: two counts of violation of conditions of release, 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e); one count of possessing a narcotic drug, 18 V.”
State v. Steuerwald, 2012 VT 98 (Vt. 2012). “§ 658(a)(1); and violating conditions of release, 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e). Defendant appealed and a de novo review was held on October 26, 2012, before Associate Justice Brian L.”
State v. Winn, 2008 VT 123 (Vt. 2008). “” 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e) (emphasis added). As the section’s statutory cross-reference indicates, § 7559(e) does not provide a basis for holding a defendant without bail independent from that already contained in § 7554.”
Show all 21 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7559(a) — 3 cases
In Re Zera, 406 A.2d 396 (Vt. 1979). “He could not have been released from the district court’s order remanding him to the Commissioner of Corrections until the conditions imposed were either complied with or amended, 13 V.S.A. § 7559(a), and thus his continued custody, even absent a written mittimus, was in part…”
Whitehouse v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2024).
Davis v. State (Vt. Super. Ct. 2026).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7559(d) — 3 cases
In Re Miller, 2009 VT 36 (Vt. 2009). “The trial court's construction of the act, entirely consistent with legislative intent evinced by the chronology and context of its earlier expression and later amendment, is overruled based, in part, on inapposite snippets of legislative history.”
State v. Ashley, 632 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1993). “Similarly, the State argues that the separate penalty provisions of 13 V.S.A. § 7559(d) (penalty for failure to appear) and § 7559(e) (penalty for violation of condition of release) reflect an intent that a condition of release may be violated even if the defendant is not…”
State v. Moran, 423 A.2d 1206 (Vt. 1980).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7559(e) — 17 cases
State v. Brillon, 2010 VT 25 (Vt. 2010). “The police were called, and defendant was arrested, *560 charged with felony second-degree aggravated domestic assault and contempt of court based on a violation of a condition of release, 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e). The aggravated domestic assault felony was also charged as a…”
State v. Malik A. Pratt, 2017 VT 9 (Vt. 2017). “§ 1201(c)(1), three misdemeanor counts of violating conditions of release, 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e), and two misdemeanor counts of buying, receiving, selling, possessing, or concealing stolen property, 13 V.”
State v. Ashley, 632 A.2d 1368 (Vt. 1993). “Similarly, the State argues that the separate penalty provisions of 13 V.S.A. § 7559(d) (penalty for failure to appear) and § 7559(e) (penalty for violation of condition of release) reflect an intent that a condition of release may be violated even if the defendant is not…”
State v. Fleurie, 2008 VT 118 (Vt. 2008). “1 The underage-drinking charge, along with a violation-of-eonditions-of-release charge, see 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e), were later dropped. 2 In State v.”
State v. Tester, 2006 VT 24 (Vt. 2006). “1 The State also initially charged defendant with a violation of conditions of release under 13 V.S.A. § 7559(e), but dismissed this charge before trial.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 13, § 7559(f) — 1 case
In Re Miller, 2009 VT 36 (Vt. 2009). “The trial court's construction of the act, entirely consistent with legislative intent evinced by the chronology and context of its earlier expression and later amendment, is overruled based, in part, on inapposite snippets of legislative history.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.