§ 676. Operation after suspension, revocation, or refusal — civil violation
(a) A person whose license or privilege to operate a motor vehicle has been revoked, suspended,
or refused by the Commissioner of Motor Vehicles for any reason other than a violation
of subsection 1091(b), 1094(b), 1128(b) or (c) of this title or section 1201 of this title or a suspension under section 1205 of this title and who operates or attempts to operate a motor vehicle upon a public highway before
the license or privilege of the person to operate a motor vehicle has been reinstated
by the Commissioner commits a civil traffic violation.
(b) In establishing a prima facie case against a person accused of violating this section,
the Judicial Bureau shall accept as evidence a printout attested to by the law enforcement
officer as the person’s motor vehicle record showing convictions and resulting license
suspensions. The admitted motor vehicle record shall establish a permissive inference
that the person was under suspension or had his or her license revoked on the dates
and time periods set forth in the record. The Judicial Bureau shall not require a
certified copy of the person’s motor vehicle record from the Department of Motor Vehicles
to establish the permissive inference. (Added 1991, No. 55, § 12; amended 1997, No. 117 (Adj. Sess.), § 8a; 1999, No. 110 (Adj. Sess.), § 3; 1999, No. 160 (Adj. Sess.), § 13; 2001, No. 75 (Adj. Sess.), § 6, eff. May 15, 2002; 2003, No. 54, § 13.)
State v. Flagg, 624 A.2d 864 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 5ד§ 674 and a new section, 23 V.S.A. § 676. The penalty for defendant’s particular conduct was decreased under the new law.”
State v. LaFountain, 628 A.2d 1243 (Vt. 1993). “Prior to the charge at issue, defendant was twice found to have committed DLS violations under 23 V.S.A. § 676. On June *315 3,1992, defendant was charged with violating § 676 for the third time, which constitutes a criminal misdemeanor offense under 23 V.”
C. Jones v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver Licensing (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). · cites it 2דOn December 2, 2014, Licensee was operating a commercial motor vehicle in Vermont when he was stopped and issued the 2014 Citation for violating Section 676 of the Vermont Vehicle Code (Vermont Code), 23 V.S.A. § 676, which prohibits an individual from operating a motor vehicle…”
State v. LeClair, 702 A.2d 628 (Vt. 1997). “These charges against defendant were predicated upon two prior civil DLS violations under 23 V.S.A. § 676, one occurring on October 4, 1991 and the other on January 3, 1994.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 23, § 676(a) — 1 case
C. Jones v. PennDOT, Bureau of Driver Licensing (Pa. Commw. Ct. 2016). “On December 2, 2014, Licensee was operating a commercial motor vehicle in Vermont when he was stopped and issued the 2014 Citation for violating Section 676 of the Vermont Vehicle Code (Vermont Code), 23 V.S.A. § 676, which prohibits an individual from operating a motor vehicle…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.