The amendment of this chapter and the repeal of prior enabling laws relating to zoning
ordinances, subdivision regulations, or bylaws or any ordinance or regulation similar
to a bylaw authorized by this chapter shall not invalidate any zoning ordinance, subdivision
regulation, or bylaw or any such ordinance or regulation enacted under those prior
enabling laws, except as follows. Effective September 1, 2005, the provisions of sections
4412 and 4413 of this title, and the provisions of subchapters 9, 10, and 11 of this chapter and the related
definitions in section 4303 of this title, shall control over any inconsistent municipal regulations, ordinances, or bylaws.
With respect to other provisions of this chapter, any previously enacted zoning ordinance,
subdivision regulation, bylaw, or such similar ordinance or regulation shall be amended
to conform with the provisions of this chapter by September 1, 2011. (Added 2003, No. 115 (Adj. Sess.), § 109.)
In re Pierce Subdivision Application, 2008 VT 100 (Vt. 2008). “24 V.S.A. § 4481. 3 Specifically, applicant requested reductions to requirements for (1) minimum lot size to one-third of an acre; (2) minimum acreage per dwelling to one-third of an acre, provided that this reduction did not affect the total number of units allowed; (3) the lot…”
Grp. five Investments LLC CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). · cites it 2דSee 24 V.S.A. § 4481. Under the “Savings Clause” contained in 24 V.”
Rublee CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2016). “203-10-09 Vtec, 3 The Bylaws are not invalid for failing to update the conditional use provisions after 2004.”
Andreen CU Permit - Decision on the Merits (Vt. Super. Ct. 2018). “24 V.S.A. § 4481. Nevertheless, we have held that a municipality’s decision not to update conditional use regulations from language that mirrors former § 4407(2)(A) after September 11, 2011 does not invalidate those regulations.”
Zaremba Grp. Dollar Gen. CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2014). “Appellants mistakenly rely on the savings clause of that Act, 24 V.S.A. § 4481, which states that the Act would not invalidate a conflicting zoning or subdivision regulation but that all regulations “shall be amended to conform with the provisions of [the 11 Appellants’ Question…”
Grp. Five Investments, LLC CU (Vt. Super. Ct. 2012). “Under the “Savings Clause” contained in 24 V.S.A. § 4481, municipalities had until September 1, 2011 to amend certain ordinances, including those enacted under 24 V.”
Moore Accessory Structure Permit (Vt. Super. Ct. 2010). “24 V.S.A. § 4481. That section also gave municipalities until September 1, 2011 to come into conformance with any provisions of the state statute that did not have an earlier superseding date.”
Huntington NOV (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007). “However, the Savings Clause provisions of 24 V.S.A. § 4481 (2006) allows the enabling laws of the prior Chapter 117 sections, including those relating to the regulation of non-conforming uses, to remain in effect until the municipality revises its municipal regulations, which is…”
Armour Siding Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). “See 24 V.S.A. § 4481. 4 While Appellant listed three questions in the Statement he filed, his first question — whether he should be permitted to use vinyl siding under the current Ordinance — is of a more general nature and is encompassed within our discussion of the other two…”
Norris Subdivision Application (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). “, November 29, 2005) (“While the state statute changed as of July 1, 2004, under 24 V.S.A. § 4481, existing municipal bylaws that are inconsistent with the new statute were not superseded by the state statute until September 1, 2005, and then only to the extent that they may be…”
Unified Buddhist Church, Inc. (Vt. Super. Ct. 2006). “Thus, as of July 1, 2004, all potential applicants for Act 250 permits were put on notice that the route of appeal for decisions of the district coordinators and district commissions would change from the state Environmental Board to the judicial branch 2 In addition, §119(a)…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.