Vt. Stat. Ann. » Title 26 Chapter 23
Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1363 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 002 : BOARD OF MEDICAL PRACTICE

(Cite as: 26 V.S.A. § 1363)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1981–1991 · leading case: Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 427 A.2d 1334 (Vt. 1981).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 427 A.2d 1334 (Vt. 1981). · cites it 7× “The appellant then sought a de novo hearing in the Orange Superior Court in accordance with 26 V.S.A. § 1363, and demanded a jury trial under 26 V.”
In Re Maple Tree Place, 594 A.2d 404 (Vt. 1991). “First, we note in direct response to the Town that there is at least one de novo appeal provision involving state agency adjudication governed by the APA, and the remand authorization in § 815 would ostensibly apply in that instance.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1363(c) — 2 cases
In Re Maple Tree Place, 594 A.2d 404 (Vt. 1991). “First, we note in direct response to the Town that there is at least one de novo appeal provision involving state agency adjudication governed by the APA, and the remand authorization in § 815 would ostensibly apply in that instance.”
Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 427 A.2d 1334 (Vt. 1981). “The appellant then sought a de novo hearing in the Orange Superior Court in accordance with 26 V.S.A. § 1363, and demanded a jury trial under 26 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 26, § 1363(e) — 1 case
Bd. of Med. Practice v. Perry-Hooker, 427 A.2d 1334 (Vt. 1981). “The appellant then sought a de novo hearing in the Orange Superior Court in accordance with 26 V.S.A. § 1363, and demanded a jury trial under 26 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.