Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 202 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL PROVISIONS

(Cite as: 28 V.S.A. § 202)

§ 202. Powers and responsibilities of the Commissioner regarding probation

The Commissioner shall be charged with the following powers and responsibilities regarding the administration of probation:

(1) To maintain general supervision of persons placed on probation, and to prescribe rules, consistent with any orders of the court, governing the conduct of such persons.

(2) To supervise the administration of probation services and establish policies and standards and make rules regarding probation investigation, supervision, case work and case loads, record keeping, and the qualification of probation officers.

(3) To use electronic monitoring equipment such as global position monitoring, automated voice recognition telephone equipment, and transdermal alcohol monitoring equipment to enable more effective or efficient supervision of individuals placed on probation. Transdermal alcohol monitoring equipment shall be used for such purposes as discouraging persons whose licenses have been suspended for DUI from operating motor vehicles on Vermont highways. (Added 1971, No. 199 (Adj. Sess.), § 20; amended 2007, No. 179 (Adj. Sess.), § 3.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2001–2021 · leading case: State v. Jonathan C. Richards, 2021 VT 40 (Vt. 2021).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

State v. Jonathan C. Richards, 2021 VT 40 (Vt. 2021). “) (citing 28 V.S.A. §§ 202(1), 252(b)(2), (8), (11)).”

State v. John J. Stern, Jr., 186 A.3d 1099 (Vt. 2018). · cites it 2× “See 28 V.S.A. § 202. The probation officer was in a position to decide whether or not to recommend a probation violation complaint if defendant violated a term of probation.”

State v. Powers, 789 A.2d 962 (Vt. 2001). “consistent with any orders of the court,” 28 V.S.A. § 202(1), even when those court orders specify a means of payment of a fine that would prevent it from being contracted out to a coEection agency.”

— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 28, § 202(1) — 2 cases

State v. Jonathan C. Richards, 2021 VT 40 (Vt. 2021). “) (citing 28 V.S.A. §§ 202(1), 252(b)(2), (8), (11)).”

State v. Powers, 789 A.2d 962 (Vt. 2001). “consistent with any orders of the court,” 28 V.S.A. § 202(1), even when those court orders specify a means of payment of a fine that would prevent it from being contracted out to a coEection agency.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.