Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL POWERS

(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 209)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 24 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1960–2024 · leading case: In Re Verizon New England, Inc., 795 A.2d 1196 (Vt. 2002).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Verizon New England, Inc., 795 A.2d 1196 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 4× “” The extent of this jurisdiction is further explained by 30 V.S.A § 209(a)(3), which grants the board jurisdiction over the “manner of operating and conducting any business subject to supervision under this chapter, so as to be reasonable and expedient, and to promote the…”
In Re Investigation of November 15, 1990 Rate Design Filing of Vermont Power Exch., 617 A.2d 418 (Vt. 1992). · cites it 5× “Assuming a statement of jurisdiction is required, the argument is groundless in this case.”
In Re Vermont Elec. Power Producers, Inc., 683 A.2d 716 (Vt. 1996). · cites it 4× “§ 824a-3, and 30 V.S.A. § 209. VPX argues that the PSB erred in: (1) failing to conclude, as a matter of law, that VPX’s designation as PURPA purchasing agent is a public franchise that cannot be terminated except for cause; (2) failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on VPX’s…”
Barnet Hydro Co. v. Pub. Serv. Bd., 807 A.2d 347 (Vt. 2002). · cites it 2× “The producers sell, *465 in aggregate, the electricity they produce to Vermont retail electric utilities by means of a single central purchasing agent, who acts as an intermediary between the small power producers and the retail electric utilities.”
Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc. v. Bandel, 375 A.2d 975 (Vt. 1977). · cites it 2× “30 V.S.A. § 209(a)(5) charges the Board with jurisdiction to concern itself with sufficiency of power systems including plants, wires and *149 exchanges and indicates in 30 V.”
In Re Entergy Nuclear Vermont Yankee, LLC, 2007 VT 103 (Vt. 2007). “Further, that the team for this inspection shall include two members from New England Coalition and two members designated by the State of Vermont[,] (3) Invoke the Board's broad discretionary powers under Title 30, in particular, 30 V.S.A. § 209, to issue an opinion advising…”
Petition of Dep't of Pub. Serv., 596 A.2d 1303 (Vt. 1991). · cites it 2× “See 30 V.S.A. § 209(a)(8); In re Vicon, 153 Vt.”
Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp., 305 A.2d 571 (Vt. 1973). “On the other hand, 30 V.S.A. § 209(3) confers jurisdiction on the Board to hear and determine matters respecting the manner of operating and conducting any business subject to the Board’s supervision under Chapter 5 of Title 30.”
Carpenter v. Home Tel. Co., 163 A.2d 838 (Vt. 1960). · cites it 2× “But this authority derives from 30 V.S.A. §209. Subsection 4 of section 209.”
In Re Vicon Recovery Sys., 572 A.2d 1355 (Vt. 1990). “To the contrary, 30 V.S.A. § 209(a)(8) could not confer jurisdiction on the Board more explicitly: [T]he board shall have jurisdiction to .”
Petition of Dept. of Pub. Serv., 632 A.2d 1373 (Vt. 1993). · cites it 2× “, 30 V.S.A. § 209(a)(8), govern the former.”
Verizon New England Inc. v. Rhode Island Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 822 A.2d 187 (R.I. 2003). “Furthermore, the PSB has jurisdiction in all matters involving "[t]he manner of operating and conducting any business subject to supervision under this chapter, so as to be reasonable and expedient, and to promote the safety, convenience and accommodation of the public * * Vt.…”
Show all 24 citing cases →
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209(3) — 2 cases
Petition of Green Mountain Power Corp., 305 A.2d 571 (Vt. 1973). “On the other hand, 30 V.S.A. § 209(3) confers jurisdiction on the Board to hear and determine matters respecting the manner of operating and conducting any business subject to the Board’s supervision under Chapter 5 of Title 30.”
Condosta v. Vermont Elec. Coop., Inc., 400 F. Supp. 358 (D. Vt. 1975).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209(4) — 1 case
Wendland v. Green Mountain Power Corp., 318 A.2d 668 (Vt. 1974).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209(a)(3) — 3 cases
In Re Verizon New England, Inc., 795 A.2d 1196 (Vt. 2002). “” The extent of this jurisdiction is further explained by 30 V.S.A § 209(a)(3), which grants the board jurisdiction over the “manner of operating and conducting any business subject to supervision under this chapter, so as to be reasonable and expedient, and to promote the…”
Verizon New England Inc. v. Rhode Island Pub. Utils. Comm'n, 822 A.2d 187 (R.I. 2003). “Furthermore, the PSB has jurisdiction in all matters involving "[t]he manner of operating and conducting any business subject to supervision under this chapter, so as to be reasonable and expedient, and to promote the safety, convenience and accommodation of the public * * Vt.…”
In Re Petition of Vermont Dep't of Pub. Serv., 2008 VT 89 (Vt. 2008).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209(a)(5) — 1 case
Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc. v. Bandel, 375 A.2d 975 (Vt. 1977). “30 V.S.A. § 209(a)(5) charges the Board with jurisdiction to concern itself with sufficiency of power systems including plants, wires and *149 exchanges and indicates in 30 V.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209(a)(6) — 1 case
PLH Vineyard Sky LLC v. Vermont Pub. Util. Comm'n (D. Vt. 2024).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209(a)(8) — 7 cases
In Re Investigation of November 15, 1990 Rate Design Filing of Vermont Power Exch., 617 A.2d 418 (Vt. 1992). “Assuming a statement of jurisdiction is required, the argument is groundless in this case.”
Barnet Hydro Co. v. Pub. Serv. Bd., 807 A.2d 347 (Vt. 2002). “The producers sell, *465 in aggregate, the electricity they produce to Vermont retail electric utilities by means of a single central purchasing agent, who acts as an intermediary between the small power producers and the retail electric utilities.”
In Re Vermont Elec. Power Producers, Inc., 683 A.2d 716 (Vt. 1996). “§ 824a-3, and 30 V.S.A. § 209. VPX argues that the PSB erred in: (1) failing to conclude, as a matter of law, that VPX’s designation as PURPA purchasing agent is a public franchise that cannot be terminated except for cause; (2) failing to hold an evidentiary hearing on VPX’s…”
Petition of Dep't of Pub. Serv., 596 A.2d 1303 (Vt. 1991). “See 30 V.S.A. § 209(a)(8); In re Vicon, 153 Vt.”
In Re Vicon Recovery Sys., 572 A.2d 1355 (Vt. 1990). “To the contrary, 30 V.S.A. § 209(a)(8) could not confer jurisdiction on the Board more explicitly: [T]he board shall have jurisdiction to .”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209(b)(3) — 1 case
Beaupre v. Green Mountain Power Corp., 776 A.2d 424 (Vt. 2001).
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 209(c) — 1 case
Vermont Elec. Power Co., Inc. v. Bandel, 375 A.2d 975 (Vt. 1977). “30 V.S.A. § 209(a)(5) charges the Board with jurisdiction to concern itself with sufficiency of power systems including plants, wires and *149 exchanges and indicates in 30 V.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.