Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 229 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : GENERAL POWERS

(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 229)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1974–2001 · leading case: Investigation Into Three Special Contracts Filed by New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 779 A.2d 693 (Vt. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Investigation Into Three Special Contracts Filed by New England Tel. & Tel. Co., 779 A.2d 693 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 5× “Under 30 V.S.A § 229, a utility must obtain Board approval for any contract for a “special product or special service not provided for or covered in the schedule.”
Wendland v. Green Mountain Power Corp., 318 A.2d 668 (Vt. 1974). “36 did not specifically provide for exceptions, and that the provisions of 30 V.S.A. § 229 were not applicable as no contract had been made between the parties.”
In re Vill. of Morrisville Water & Light Dep't, 365 A.2d 525 (Vt. 1976). · cites it 3× “Did the Public Service Board err in finding that the evidence was insufficient to establish a lawful “contract for a definite term” within the meaning of 30 V.S.A. Section 229? Questions 2, 3 and 4 relate to interpretation of such a contract, if Question No.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.