Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 30, § 2801 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(Cite as: 30 V.S.A. § 2801)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1974–2007 · leading case: Wendland v. Green Mountain Power Corp., 318 A.2d 668 (Vt. 1974).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Wendland v. Green Mountain Power Corp., 318 A.2d 668 (Vt. 1974). · cites it 5× “*322 Appellant, Green Mountain Power Corporation, argues that although utility companies are required to sell and distribute electricity to all persons requesting such service, the sale and distribution of electricity is subject to reasonable limitations as to charges,…”
Condosta v. Vermont Elec. Coop., Inc., 400 F. Supp. 358 (D. Vt. 1975). “Furthermore, under Vermont law, the plaintiff also has a legitimate claim of entitlement to electric service: A corporation engaged in the business of transmitting in this state electric energy .”
Devost v. New Hampshire Elec. Coop., Inc., 349 A.2d 896 (Vt. 1975). “30 V.S.A. § 2801. The order of the Public Service Board is affirmed.”
CVPS/Verizon Act 250 LU Permit Amendment 7C1252 (Vt. Super. Ct. 2007). “” Based upon a request for service1 by a customer, CVPS and co-applicant Verizon New England applied for an Act 250 permit in October 2006 (#7C1252) to extend an electrical distribution and telephone line near Peacham Road in Danville by approximately 1 CVPS is required to…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.