Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3757 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 001 : AGRICULTURAL LAND AND MANAGED FORESTLAND USE VALUE APPRAISAL PROGRAM

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 3757)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2004–2024 · leading case: Jones v. Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Jones v. Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 2× “Finally, the court appears to have mistakenly concluded that the State assessed the land use change tax at the current rate of twenty percent of the land’s fair market value under 32 V.SA. § 3757(a), rather than the ten percent rate in effect in 1992.”
Jones v. Dept. of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). · cites it 2× “Finally, the court appears to have mistakenly concluded that the State assessed the land-use-change tax at the current rate of twenty percent of the land's fair market value under 32 V.S.A. § 3757(a), rather than the ten percent rate in effect in 1992.”
Egan v. Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005). · cites it 5× “32 V.S.A. § 3757. 3 The effect of this payment meant that the parcel was freed from a tax lien that ran with the property.”
William Fulton & Mary Fulton v. Dep't of Forests, Parks, & Rec., 2024 VT 56 (Vt. 2024). “See generally 32 V.S.A. § 3757 (providing for tax consequences where owner engages in development of property).”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3757(a) — 2 cases
Jones v. Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). “Finally, the court appears to have mistakenly concluded that the State assessed the land use change tax at the current rate of twenty percent of the land’s fair market value under 32 V.SA. § 3757(a), rather than the ten percent rate in effect in 1992.”
Jones v. Dept. of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). “Finally, the court appears to have mistakenly concluded that the State assessed the land-use-change tax at the current rate of twenty percent of the land's fair market value under 32 V.S.A. § 3757(a), rather than the ten percent rate in effect in 1992.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 3757(f) — 3 cases
Jones v. Dep't of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). “Finally, the court appears to have mistakenly concluded that the State assessed the land use change tax at the current rate of twenty percent of the land’s fair market value under 32 V.SA. § 3757(a), rather than the ten percent rate in effect in 1992.”
Egan v. Dep't of Taxes (Vt. Super. Ct. 2005). “32 V.S.A. § 3757. 3 The effect of this payment meant that the parcel was freed from a tax lien that ran with the property.”
Jones v. Dept. of Forests, Parks & Rec., 2004 VT 49 (Vt. 2004). “Finally, the court appears to have mistakenly concluded that the State assessed the land-use-change tax at the current rate of twenty percent of the land's fair market value under 32 V.S.A. § 3757(a), rather than the ten percent rate in effect in 1992.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.