Vermont Statutes Annotated

Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9777 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VT-LEGlegislature.vermont.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subchapter 003 : IMPOSITION, RATE, AND PAYMENT OF TAX

(Cite as: 32 V.S.A. § 9777)
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 1976–2016 · leading case: Vermont Soc'y of Ass'n Executives v. Milne, 779 A.2d 20 (Vt. 2001).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Vermont Soc'y of Ass'n Executives v. Milne, 779 A.2d 20 (Vt. 2001). · cites it 4× “See 32 V.S.A. § 9777(a) (taxpayer may request hearing before commissioner to challenge assessment of unpaid taxes); 32 V.”
Rock of Ages Corp. v. Comm'r of Taxes, 360 A.2d 63 (Vt. 1976). “Appellee, pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 9777, filed its appeal from this assessment to the Commissioner of Taxes on the ground that the items taxed were consumed in such a fashion as to be exempt from the tax under 32 V.”
Bud Crossman Plumbing & Heating v. Comm'r of Taxes, 455 A.2d 799 (Vt. 1982). · cites it 2× “Plaintiff *184 applied to the Commissioner of Taxes for a hearing in accordance with 32 V.S.A. § 9777. At the conclusion of the hearing, the Commissioner determined the assessment was proper under 32 V.”
Chittenden Trust Co. v. King, 465 A.2d 1100 (Vt. 1983). “32 V.S.A. § 9777. After conducting a formal hearing, the Commissioner upheld the Department’s assessment, whereupon the Bank petitioned the Chittenden Superior Court for relief.”
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of Taxes, 2016 VT 69 (Vt. 2016). “Retailer and lender appealed the Department’s assessments and requested a hearing before the Commissioner of the Department pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 9777(a). The Commissioner affirmed the respective refund request denial and tax assessment in written decisions.”
— Vt. Stat. Ann. tit. 32, § 9777(a) — 2 cases
Vermont Soc'y of Ass'n Executives v. Milne, 779 A.2d 20 (Vt. 2001). “See 32 V.S.A. § 9777(a) (taxpayer may request hearing before commissioner to challenge assessment of unpaid taxes); 32 V.”
Citibank (South Dakota), N.A. v. Dept. of Taxes / Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Dept. of Taxes, 2016 VT 69 (Vt. 2016). “Retailer and lender appealed the Department’s assessments and requested a hearing before the Commissioner of the Department pursuant to 32 V.S.A. § 9777(a). The Commissioner affirmed the respective refund request denial and tax assessment in written decisions.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.