Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 13.1-662 (2026)

Voting entitlement of shares

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A. Except as provided in subsections B, C, D, and E or unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise, each outstanding share, regardless of class or series, is entitled to one vote on each matter voted on at a shareholders' meeting. Only shares are entitled to vote.

B. Unless the articles of incorporation provide otherwise, in the election of directors each outstanding share, regardless of class or series, is entitled to one vote for as many persons as there are directors to be elected at that time and for whose election the shareholder has a right to vote.

C. Redeemable shares are not entitled to vote after delivery of written notice of redemption is effective and a sum sufficient to redeem the shares has been deposited with a bank, trust company, or other financial institution under an irrevocable obligation to pay the holders the redemption price on surrender of the shares.

D. Shares of a corporation are not entitled to vote if they are owned directly or indirectly through an entity of which a majority of the voting power is held directly or indirectly by the corporation or that is otherwise controlled by the corporation.

E. If a corporation holds in a fiduciary capacity its own shares directly, or indirectly through an entity of which a majority of the voting power is held directly or indirectly by the corporation or that is otherwise controlled by the corporation, such shares shall not be deemed to be outstanding and entitled to vote unless:

1. The corporation has authority to vote the shares only in accordance with directions of the principal or beneficiary; or

2. A co-fiduciary exists, pursuant to § 6.2-1011 or otherwise, in which event the co-fiduciary may vote the shares.

F. Shares standing in the name of another corporation, domestic or foreign, may be voted by such officers, agent, or proxy as the bylaws of such corporation may prescribe, or, in the absence of such provision, as the board of directors of such corporation may determine.

G. Shares standing in the name of a partnership may be voted by any partner. Shares standing in the name of a limited liability company may be voted as the articles of organization or an operating agreement may prescribe, or in the absence of any such provision as the managers, or if there are no managers, the members of the limited liability company may determine.

H. Shares held by three or fewer persons as joint tenants or tenants in common or tenants by the entirety may be voted by any of such persons. If more than one of such tenants votes such shares, the vote shall be divided among them in proportion to the number of such tenants voting.

I. Shares held by an administrator, executor, guardian, conservator, committee, or curator representing the shareholder may be voted by such person without a transfer of such shares into such person's name. Shares standing in the name of a trustee may be voted by the trustee, but no trustee is entitled to vote shares held by the trustee without a transfer of such shares into the trustee's name.

J. Shares standing in the name of a receiver or a trustee in proceedings under the federal Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 may be voted by such person. Shares held by or under the control of a receiver or a trustee in proceedings under the federal Bankruptcy Reform Act of 1978 may be voted by such person without the transfer thereof into such person's name if authority to do so is contained in an order of the court by which such person was appointed.

K. Nothing herein contained shall prevent trustees or other fiduciaries holding shares registered in the name of a nominee pursuant to § 6.2-1010 from causing such shares to be voted by such nominee as the trustee or other fiduciary may direct. Such nominee may vote shares as directed by a trustee or other fiduciary without the necessity of transferring the shares to the name of the trustee or other fiduciary.

L. A shareholder whose shares are pledged is entitled to vote such shares until the shares have been transferred into the name of the pledgee, and thereafter the pledgee is entitled to vote the shares so transferred.

M. The articles of incorporation may provide that the holders of bonds or debentures shall be entitled to vote on specified matters and such right shall not be terminated except upon consent of the holders of two-thirds in aggregate principal amount.

N. Subject to the provisions of § 13.1-665, when shares are held by more than one of the fiduciaries referred to in this section, the shares shall be voted as determined by a majority of such fiduciaries, except that (i) if they are equally divided as to a vote, the vote of the shares is divided equally and (ii) if only one of such fiduciaries is present in person or by proxy at a meeting, the fiduciary shall be entitled to vote all the shares. A proxy apparently executed by one of several of such fiduciaries shall be presumed to be valid until challenged and the burden of proving invalidity shall rest on the challenger.

Code 1950, §§ 13-192 to 13-198, 13-203, 13.1-32; 1956, c. 428; 1958, c. 564; 1975, c. 500; 1984, c. 366; 1985, c. 522; 1990, c. 267; 1997, c. 801; 2005, c. 765; 2019, c. 734.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1989–2024 · leading case: Lockhart v. Commonwealth Educ. Sys. Corp., 439 S.E.2d 328 (Va. 1994).
Lockhart v. Commonwealth Educ. Sys. Corp., 439 S.E.2d 328 (Va. 1994). · cites it 4× “This statutory provision contemplates that the right to vote shall be exercised free of duress and intimidation imposed on individual stockholders by corporate management.”
Lawrence Chrysler Plymouth Corp. v. Brooks, 465 S.E.2d 806 (Va. 1996). · cites it 4× “1-32, now Code § 13.1-662, which conferred upon the employees as stockholders the right to vote.”
Bailey v. Scott-Gallaher, Inc., 480 S.E.2d 502 (Va. 1997). · cites it 4× “1-32 (now Code § 13.1-662), which guarantees every shareholder the right to vote his or her stock "free of duress and intimidation," we recognized a narrow public policy exception to the employment-at-will doctrine where employee/shareholders were terminated after they…”
Doss v. Jamco, Inc., 492 S.E.2d 441 (Va. 1997). · cites it 3× “The employees were discharged after failing to heed a threat from the employer that their employment would be terminated if they failed to vote their stock according to the wishes of corporate management.”
Rowan v. Tractor Supply Co., 559 S.E.2d 709 (Va. 2002). · cites it 2× “1-32 (currently codified in Code § 13.1-662) gave shareholders the right to vote their shares.”
McFarland v. Virginia Ret. Servs. of Chesterfield, L.L.C., 477 F. Supp. 2d 727 (E.D. Va. 2007). · cites it 2× “Obviously, to fully realize the public policy underlying the shareholders’ statutory right, shareholders had to be allowed to vote such shares free from duress or intimidation. Thus, the Supreme Court of Virginia concluded that “[b]e-cause the right conferred by statute is in…”
Leverton v. AlliedSignal, Inc., 991 F. Supp. 486 (E.D. Va. 1998). · cites it 3× “1-32, now Va.Code § 13.1-662) enunciated a public policy.”
Anderson v. ITT Indus. Corp., 92 F. Supp. 2d 516 (E.D. Va. 2000). · cites it 3× “, by false pretense, states in pertinent part: If any person obtain, by any false pretense or token, from any person, with intent to defraud, money or other property which may be the subject of larceny, he shall be deemed guilty of larceny thereof.”
Dray v. New Mkt. Poultry Prods., Inc., 518 S.E.2d 312 (Va. 1999). “1-32 (now § 13.1-662) conferred upon the plaintiffs as stockholders the right to vote their shares “free of duress and intimidation imposed on individual stockholders by corporate management.”
In Re Massey, 225 B.R. 887 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1998). · cites it 2× “The second, Va.Code Ann. § 13.1-662(H), provides as follows: Shares held by two or more persons as joint tenants or tenants in common or tenants by the entirety may be voted by any of such persons.”
Schmidt v. Bartech Grp., Inc., 119 F. Supp. 3d 374 (E.D. Va. 2014). · cites it 3× “1-32, now Va. Code § 13.1-662. Id. Under Bowman, an at-will employee may bring a common law claim of wrongful discharge if the employee’s termination violates Virginia’s public policy.”
Oakley v. May Dep't Stores Co., 17 F. Supp. 2d 533 (E.D. Va. 1998). · cites it 2× “2d at 801 (finding public policy exception where discharges violated Va.Code Ann. § 13.1-662, which gave employee shareholders power to vote their stock as they desired).”
— Va. Code Ann. § 13.1-662(A) — 2 cases
Goode v. Goode, 29 Va. Cir. 409 (Fredericksburg Cir. Ct. 1992).
Dawyot v. Catawba Capital Mgmt., Inc., 82 Va. Cir. 521 (Roanoke County Cir. Ct. 2011).
— Va. Code Ann. § 13.1-662(D) — 1 case
Evitt v. Lake Holiday Country Club, 16 Va. Cir. 255 (Frederick Cir. Ct. 1989).
— Va. Code Ann. § 13.1-662(H) — 1 case
In Re Massey, 225 B.R. 887 (Bankr. E.D. Va. 1998). “The second, Va.Code Ann. § 13.1-662(H), provides as follows: Shares held by two or more persons as joint tenants or tenants in common or tenants by the entirety may be voted by any of such persons.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.