Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 18.2-388 (2026)
Intoxication in public; penalty; transportation of public inebriates to detoxification center
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
If any person is intoxicated in public, whether such intoxication results from alcohol, narcotic drug, or other intoxicant or drug of whatever nature, he is guilty of a Class 4 misdemeanor. In any area in which there is located a court-approved detoxification center, a law-enforcement officer may authorize the transportation, by police or otherwise, of public inebriates to such detoxification center in lieu of arrest; however, no person shall be involuntarily detained in such center.
Code 1950, § 18.1-237; 1960, c. 358; 1964, c. 434; 1975, cc. 14, 15; 1979, c. 654; 1982, c. 666; 1983, c. 187; 1990, c. 965; 2020, c. 160.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 60
cases (9 in the last 5 years), 1984–2026 · leading case: Crislip v. Commonwealth, 554 S.E.2d 96 (Va. Ct. App. 2001).
Crislip v. Commonwealth, 554 S.E.2d 96 (Va. Ct. App. 2001). “Essentially, Crislip argues that the words “in public” under Code § 18.2-388 are synonymous with the words “public place,” as that term is defined in Code § 4.”
McGhee v. Com., 701 S.E.2d 58 (Va. 2010). “We consider whether police officers had probable cause to arrest appellant Bradley William McGhee ("McGhee") for violating Code § 18.2-388 (public intoxication) and whether the officers conducted a valid search of McGhee's vehicle.”
Manning v. Caldwell for City of Roanoke, 930 F.3d 264 (4th Cir. 2019). “See Va. Code §§ 18.2-388, 18.2-11(d). B. Each of the named Plaintiffs in this case, Bryan Manning, Ryan Williams, Richard Deckerhoff, and Richard Eugene Walls, alleges that he has been interdicted as an "habitual drunkard" pursuant to this statutory scheme.”
Debroux v. Commonwealth, 528 S.E.2d 151 (Va. Ct. App. 2000). “PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS The search of appellant may nevertheless have been reasonable if supported by probable cause to arrest for public drunkenness under Code § 18.2-388. However, as set out above, the trial court did not consider the probable cause issue and made no factual…”
Pulliam v. Allen, 466 U.S. 522 (1984). “His arrests were for alleged violations of Va. Code § 18.2-388 (1982), being drunk in public.”
Flaherty v. Commonwealth, 415 S.E.2d 867 (Va. Ct. App. 1992). “2-351; and (2) that a 1983 conviction was for violating Code § 18.2-388 and should not be considered a qualifying conviction for habitual offender status under Code § 46.”
United States v. Romero-Caceres, 356 F. Supp. 3d 541 (E.D. Va. 2018). “2-894, Drunk in Public in violation of Va. Code § 18.2-388, and Reckless Driving in violation of Va.”
Alan Neff v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 758 S.E.2d 87 (Va. Ct. App. 2014). “The trial court convicted Alan Neff of being intoxicated in public in violation of Code § 18.2-388, and assault and battery of a police officer in violation of Code § 18.”
Burgess v. City of Virginia Beach, 385 S.E.2d 59 (Va. Ct. App. 1989). “Driving by in his Blazer at about 30 miles per hour, Burgess stuck his head out of the window and yelled, "F_____ cops.”
A.R.A. v. Commonwealth, 809 S.E.2d 660 (Va. 2018). “1, and public swearing or intoxication, in violation of Code § 18.2-388. The charges stemmed from her behavior after she drank to excess.”
Harrison v. Prince William Cnty. Police Dep't, 640 F. Supp. 2d 688 (E.D. Va. 2009). “See Va.Code Ann. §§ 18.2-388, 18.2-416. Virginia’s disorderly conduct statute is at Va.”
Kal Robert Molinet v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 779 S.E.2d 231 (Va. Ct. App. 2015). “Appellant was also charged with public intoxication in violation of Code § 18.2-388. The jury found appellant not guilty of that charge.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.