Va. Code » Title 19.2. Criminal Procedure » Chapter 18. Sentence; Judgment; Execution of Sentence » Article 4. Detention Center Incarceration Program
Virginia Code

Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2 (2026)

Repealed

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Repealed by Acts 2019, c. 618, cl. 2.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 15 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2023 · leading case: Peyton v. Com., 604 S.E.2d 17 (Va. 2004).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Peyton v. Com., 604 S.E.2d 17 (Va. 2004). · cites it 17× “In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia erred in determining that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the suspended sentence of a defendant who had been placed in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2, but…”
Charles v. Com., 613 S.E.2d 432 (Va. 2005). · cites it 13× “In this appeal, we consider whether participation in the Detention Center Incarceration Program (the Program), Code § 19.2-316.2, *433 is incarceration and whether a probationer is entitled to credit for time served in the Program when his probation is later revoked.”
Word v. Commonwealth, 586 S.E.2d 282 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 26× “I believe those statutes did not authorize the revocation of *289 the sentence.”
Peyton v. Commonwealth, 585 S.E.2d 345 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). · cites it 54× “The trial court further ordered that Peyton be evaluated for participation in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2. Peyton was accepted into the program, and the trial court suspended the balance of his sentence on the condition that he complete the…”
Rhodes v. Commonwealth, 613 S.E.2d 466 (Va. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 10× “Code § 19.2-316.2(A)(4) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Upon the defendant’s (i) voluntary withdrawal from the [detention center] program [or] (ii) removal from the [detention center] program by the Department for intractable behavior as defined in § 19.”
Blagman v. White, 112 F. Supp. 2d 534 (E.D. Va. 2000). · cites it 6× “See Va. Code §§ 19.2-316.2, 53.1-67.8. See also Va.”
Carroll v. Com., 701 S.E.2d 414 (Va. 2010). · cites it 2× “" In Peyton , the defendant was convicted of a drug offense, given a suspended sentence, and placed on probation conditioned upon his entry into and successful completion of his participation in the Detention Center Incarceration Program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2. Id. at…”
United States v. Giovanni Ramirez, 347 F.3d 792 (9th Cir. 2003). “106 (l)-(2) (2001) (authorizing a "continuum of administrative sanctions,” including jail, community service, house arrest, electronic surveillance, restitution, and work release, for violations of post-prison supervision); Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2 (A)(3) (Michie 2003)…”
Vonda Kay Wilson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 522 S.E.2d 385 (Va. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 2× “See Code §§ 19.2-316.2, 53.1-67.8. After a psychiatric examination of Wilson, the Department of Corrections reported that she was ineligible for the Detention Center Program, an alternative “boot camp” facility, due to her schizophrenic condition.”
Atif Charles v. Commonwealth (Va. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 38× “See Code § 19.2-316.2. Charles entered the program on December 3, 2001, and successfully completed it on April 26, 2002.”
Troy Lamont Boone v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 728 S.E.2d 517 (Va. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “He was sentenced to five years imprisonment, but the court suspended that time conditioned on three years of good behavior, supervised probation, and successful completion of “the Detention Center followed by the Diversion Incarceration Programs” pursuant to Code §§ 19.2-316.2…”
Shaheem Labeeb Rasheed,a/k/a Alvin A. Barnes v. CW (Va. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 10× “to determine suitability for participation in the Diversion Center Incarceration Program and/or Southampton Detention Incarceration Program" pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2. 1 See Code §§ 19.2-316.”
Show all 15 citing cases →
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(3) — 2 cases
Blagman v. White, 112 F. Supp. 2d 534 (E.D. Va. 2000). “See Va. Code §§ 19.2-316.2, 53.1-67.8. See also Va.”
Shaheem Labeeb Rasheed,a/k/a Alvin A. Barnes v. CW (Va. Ct. App. 2002). “to determine suitability for participation in the Diversion Center Incarceration Program and/or Southampton Detention Incarceration Program" pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2. 1 See Code §§ 19.2-316.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(4) — 2 cases
Word v. Commonwealth, 586 S.E.2d 282 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). “I believe those statutes did not authorize the revocation of *289 the sentence.”
Peyton v. Com., 604 S.E.2d 17 (Va. 2004). “In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia erred in determining that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the suspended sentence of a defendant who had been placed in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2, but…”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(A) — 2 cases
Peyton v. Commonwealth, 585 S.E.2d 345 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). “The trial court further ordered that Peyton be evaluated for participation in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2. Peyton was accepted into the program, and the trial court suspended the balance of his sentence on the condition that he complete the…”
Atif Charles v. Commonwealth (Va. Ct. App. 2004). “See Code § 19.2-316.2. Charles entered the program on December 3, 2001, and successfully completed it on April 26, 2002.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(A)(1) — 2 cases
Peyton v. Com., 604 S.E.2d 17 (Va. 2004). “In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia erred in determining that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the suspended sentence of a defendant who had been placed in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2, but…”
Atif Charles v. Commonwealth (Va. Ct. App. 2004). “See Code § 19.2-316.2. Charles entered the program on December 3, 2001, and successfully completed it on April 26, 2002.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(A)(2) — 3 cases
Peyton v. Commonwealth, 585 S.E.2d 345 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). “The trial court further ordered that Peyton be evaluated for participation in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2. Peyton was accepted into the program, and the trial court suspended the balance of his sentence on the condition that he complete the…”
Peyton v. Com., 604 S.E.2d 17 (Va. 2004). “In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia erred in determining that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the suspended sentence of a defendant who had been placed in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2, but…”
Word v. Commonwealth, 586 S.E.2d 282 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). “I believe those statutes did not authorize the revocation of *289 the sentence.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(A)(3) — 2 cases
Peyton v. Com., 604 S.E.2d 17 (Va. 2004). “In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia erred in determining that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the suspended sentence of a defendant who had been placed in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2, but…”
Atif Charles v. Commonwealth (Va. Ct. App. 2004). “See Code § 19.2-316.2. Charles entered the program on December 3, 2001, and successfully completed it on April 26, 2002.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(A)(4) — 5 cases
Peyton v. Com., 604 S.E.2d 17 (Va. 2004). “In this appeal, we consider whether the Court of Appeals of Virginia erred in determining that a trial court did not abuse its discretion in revoking the suspended sentence of a defendant who had been placed in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2, but…”
Peyton v. Commonwealth, 585 S.E.2d 345 (Va. Ct. App. 2003). “The trial court further ordered that Peyton be evaluated for participation in an alternative sentencing program pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2. Peyton was accepted into the program, and the trial court suspended the balance of his sentence on the condition that he complete the…”
Rhodes v. Commonwealth, 613 S.E.2d 466 (Va. Ct. App. 2005). “Code § 19.2-316.2(A)(4) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Upon the defendant’s (i) voluntary withdrawal from the [detention center] program [or] (ii) removal from the [detention center] program by the Department for intractable behavior as defined in § 19.”
Atif Charles v. Commonwealth (Va. Ct. App. 2004). “See Code § 19.2-316.2. Charles entered the program on December 3, 2001, and successfully completed it on April 26, 2002.”
Shaheem Labeeb Rasheed,a/k/a Alvin A. Barnes v. CW (Va. Ct. App. 2002). “to determine suitability for participation in the Diversion Center Incarceration Program and/or Southampton Detention Incarceration Program" pursuant to Code § 19.2-316.2. 1 See Code §§ 19.2-316.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(A)(4)(ii) — 1 case
Rhodes v. Commonwealth, 613 S.E.2d 466 (Va. Ct. App. 2005). “Code § 19.2-316.2(A)(4) provides, in pertinent part, as follows: Upon the defendant’s (i) voluntary withdrawal from the [detention center] program [or] (ii) removal from the [detention center] program by the Department for intractable behavior as defined in § 19.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(B) — 1 case
Atif Charles v. Commonwealth (Va. Ct. App. 2004). “See Code § 19.2-316.2. Charles entered the program on December 3, 2001, and successfully completed it on April 26, 2002.”
— Va. Code Ann. § 19.2-316.2(B)(3) — 1 case
Atif Charles v. Commonwealth (Va. Ct. App. 2004). “See Code § 19.2-316.2. Charles entered the program on December 3, 2001, and successfully completed it on April 26, 2002.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.