Virginia Code
Va. Code Ann. § 53.1-40.01 (2026)
Conditional release of geriatric prisoners
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
VA-LISlaw.lis.virginia.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any person serving a sentence imposed upon a conviction for a felony offense, other than a Class 1 felony, (i) who has reached the age of sixty-five or older and who has served at least five years of the sentence imposed or (ii) who has reached the age of sixty or older and who has served at least ten years of the sentence imposed may petition the Parole Board for conditional release. The Parole Board shall promulgate regulations to implement the provisions of this section.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 49
cases (17 in the last 5 years), 1997–2025 · leading case: Fishback v. Commonwealth, 532 S.E.2d 629 (Va. 2000).
Fishback v. Commonwealth, 532 S.E.2d 629 (Va. 2000). “1 and the exclusion of prisoners serving life sentences for class one felonies from being eligible for geriatric release pursuant to Code § 53.1-40.01 rendered a defendant convicted of capital murder parole-ineligible.”
Vasquez v. Commonwealth, 781 S.E.2d 920 (Va. 2016). “3 The statute provides an age-based review according to normal parole considerations including the individual's personal, social and criminal history, his conduct in prison including engagement in rehabilitative and vocational programs, the sentence and type of offense, changes…”
Johnson, Raheem v. Commonwealth, 793 S.E.2d 326 (Va. 2016). “01 when he turns 60 in 2053, in which case the possibility exists that Johnson’s sentence of life imprisonment will convert into a sentence of approximately forty years.”
Bell v. Commonwealth, 563 S.E.2d 695 (Va. 2002). “Bell, nevertheless, argues that the circuit court had a duty to fashion an appropriate response to the jury’s question and suggests that such a response would have been that “a life sentence for Bell would permit no parole, no community supervision, no early release program, or…”
Yarbrough v. Commonwealth, 519 S.E.2d 602 (Va. 1999). “Accordingly, while we recognize that the limitations placed upon the availability of parole by Code §§ 53.1-40.01 and 53.1-165.1 may call into question the continued viability of the Coward rule in a non-capital felony case, as where, for example, a defendant subject to a…”
Angel v. Com., 704 S.E.2d 386 (Va. 2011). “The Commonwealth replies that Graham does not require the result advanced by Angel because Code § 53.1-40.01 provides for the conditional release of prisoners who have reached a certain age and served a certain length of imprisonment, thus complying with the Supreme Court's…”
Dennis LeBlanc v. Randall Mathena, 841 F.3d 256 (4th Cir. 2016). “In opposition, Respondents asserted that, notwithstanding Virginia’s abolition of parole, Petitioner’s life sentence did not violate Graham because 4 Virginia allows for conditional release of “geriatric prisoners,” Va. Code Ann. § 53.1-40.01 (“Geriatric Release”).”
Blount v. Clarke, 782 S.E.2d 152 (Va. 2016). “2d 386 , 401-02 (2011), in holding that Code § 53.1-40.01, which permits inmates to apply for conditional release at age sixty, provides "an appropriate mechanism" for compliance with Graham .”
Virginia v. LeBlanc, 137 S. Ct. 1726 (2017). “4 2016) (citing Va. Code Ann. § 53.1-40.01 ). Seven years after respondent was sentenced, this Court decided Graham v.”
Raheem Chabezz Johnson v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 755 S.E.2d 468 (Va. Ct. App. 2014). “For defendants, such as appellant, who were under eighteen years of age at the time of the offense, Code § 18.”
Jordan v. Commonwealth, 809 S.E.2d 622 (Va. 2018). “See Code § 53.1-40.01. We, therefore, find no abuse of discretion under these circumstances.”
State v. Shaffer, 77 So. 3d 939 (La. 2011). “01, which state that any person sentenced for a felony offense, other than a Class 1 felony, who has served at least five years of his sentence and reached the age of 65 years, or has served at least 10 years of his sentence and reached the age of 60 years, may apply to the…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.