Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 1.80.170 (2026)

Acceptance and distribution of electronic records by governmental agencies

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Except as otherwise provided in RCW 1.80.110(6), each governmental agency of this state shall determine whether, and the extent to which, a governmental agency will send and accept electronic records and electronic signatures to and from other persons and otherwise create, generate, communicate, store, process, use, and rely upon electronic records and electronic signatures.
(2) To the extent that a governmental agency uses electronic records and electronic signatures under subsection (1) of this section, the governmental agency, giving due consideration to security, may specify:
(a) The manner and format in which the electronic records must be created, generated, sent, communicated, received, and stored and the systems established for those purposes;
(b) If electronic records must be signed by electronic means, the type of electronic signature required, the manner and format in which the electronic signature must be affixed to the electronic record, and the identity of, or criteria that must be met by, any third party used by a person filing a document to facilitate the process;
(c) Control processes and procedures as appropriate to ensure adequate preservation, disposition, integrity, security, confidentiality, and auditability of electronic records; and
(d) Any other required attributes for electronic records which are specified for corresponding nonelectronic records or reasonably necessary under the circumstances.
(3) Except as otherwise provided in RCW 1.80.110(6), this chapter does not require a governmental agency of this state to use or permit the use of electronic records or electronic signatures.
[ 2020 c 57 s 18.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Kim Wyman, V. Gerald Hankerson (Wash. Ct. App. 2022).
Kim Wyman, V. Gerald Hankerson (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). · cites it 2× “RCW 1.80.170(1), (2).9 And even there, the legislature was careful to provide that “this chapter does not require a 8 Compare with RCW 29A.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 1.80.170(1) — 1 case
Kim Wyman, V. Gerald Hankerson (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “RCW 1.80.170(1), (2).9 And even there, the legislature was careful to provide that “this chapter does not require a 8 Compare with RCW 29A.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 1.80.170(3) — 1 case
Kim Wyman, V. Gerald Hankerson (Wash. Ct. App. 2022). “RCW 1.80.170(1), (2).9 And even there, the legislature was careful to provide that “this chapter does not require a 8 Compare with RCW 29A.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.