Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.106.010 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This chapter does not apply to resulting trusts, constructive trusts, business trusts where certificates of beneficial interest are issued to the beneficiaries, investment trusts, voting trusts, insurance trusts prior to the death of the insured, trusts in the nature of mortgages or pledges, liquidation trusts or trusts for the sole purpose of paying dividends, interest or interest coupons, salaries, wages or pensions; nor does this chapter apply to personal representatives.

[ 2013 c 272 s 25; 1985 c 30 s 95. Prior: 1984 c 149 s 128; 1955 c 33 s 30.30.010; prior: 1951 c 226 s 10. Formerly RCW 30.30.010.]

Notes:

Application—2013 c 272: See note following RCW 11.98.002.

Short title—Application—Purpose—Severability—1985 c 30: See RCW 11.02.900 through 11.02.903.

Severability—Effective dates—1984 c 149: See notes following RCW 11.02.005.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Anderson v. Dussault, 310 P.3d 854 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Anderson v. Dussault, 310 P.3d 854 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 4× “” 11 Former RCW 11.106.010 (1985). As the Washington Supreme Court explained nearly 90 years ago, [W]here a trust arises by an express contract or agreement between the parties it is an express trust; and under practically all authorities implied, constructive, and resulting…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.