Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.11.005 (2026)

Construction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) When construing sections and provisions of this chapter, the sections and provisions must:
(a) Be liberally construed and applied to promote the purposes of this chapter;
(b) Be considered part of a general act that is intended as unified coverage of the subject matter, and no part of this chapter may be deemed impliedly repealed by subsequent legislation if the construction can be reasonably avoided;
(c) Not be held invalid because of the invalidity of other sections or provisions of this chapter as long as the section or provision in question can be given effect without regard to the invalid section or provision, and to this end the sections or provisions of this chapter are severable;
(d) Not be construed by reference to section or subsection headings as used in this chapter, since these do not constitute any part of the law;
(e) Not be deemed to alter the community or separate property nature of any asset passing outside a testator's will or any individual's community or separate rights to the asset, and a testator's community or separate property rights to the asset are not affected by whether it passes outside the will or, under this chapter, by disposition under the will; and
(f) Not be construed as authorizing or extending the authority of any financial institution or other third party to sell or otherwise create assets that would pass outside a testator's will upon such terms as would contravene any other applicable federal or state law.
(2) The sections and provisions of this chapter apply to an owner who dies while a resident of this state on or after July 1, 1999, and to a nonprobate asset the disposition of which on the death of the owner would otherwise be governed by the law of this state.
[ 1998 c 292 s 103.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2016 · leading case: Est. Of Carol Collister, 382 P.3d 37 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016).
Est. Of Carol Collister, 382 P.3d 37 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). · cites it 2× “RCW 11.11.005(l)(a). However, we may not construe those provisions in a manner that “alter [s] the community or separate property nature of any asset passing outside a testator’s will or any individual’s community or separate rights to the asset.”
Manary v. Anderson, 292 P.3d 96 (Wash. 2013). “RCW 11.11.005(l)(a). ¶24 Manary argues that the Act does not apply because the property is not a nonprobate asset, Anderson did not meet the Act’s requirements, and the will bequest is generally insufficient.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.11.005(l)(a) — 2 cases
Manary v. Anderson, 292 P.3d 96 (Wash. 2013). “RCW 11.11.005(l)(a). ¶24 Manary argues that the Act does not apply because the property is not a nonprobate asset, Anderson did not meet the Act’s requirements, and the will bequest is generally insufficient.”
Est. Of Carol Collister, 382 P.3d 37 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “RCW 11.11.005(l)(a). However, we may not construe those provisions in a manner that “alter [s] the community or separate property nature of any asset passing outside a testator’s will or any individual’s community or separate rights to the asset.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.11.005(l)(e) — 1 case
Est. Of Carol Collister, 382 P.3d 37 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “RCW 11.11.005(l)(a). However, we may not construe those provisions in a manner that “alter [s] the community or separate property nature of any asset passing outside a testator’s will or any individual’s community or separate rights to the asset.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.