Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.11.050 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) Written notice under this chapter must be served personally or by certified mail, return receipt requested and postage prepaid, on the financial institution or other third party having the nonprobate asset in its possession or control, on the beneficiary, on the testamentary beneficiary, and on the personal representative, and proof of the mailing or service must be made by affidavit and filed under the cause number assigned to the owner's estate. Notice to a financial institution must include notice delivered as follows:
(a) If the nonprobate asset was maintained at a specific office of the financial institution, notice must be delivered to the office at which the nonprobate asset was maintained, which notice must be directed to the manager of the office;
(b) If the nonprobate asset was held in a trust administered by a financial institution, notice must be delivered to the office at which the trust was administered, which notice must be directed to a named officer responsible for the administration of the trust; and
(c) In all cases, notice must be delivered to any other location and in any other manner specifically designated in a written agreement signed by the owner and the financial institution, including but not limited to a signature card or deposit agreement.
(2) Written notice to a financial institution or other third party of the testamentary disposition of a nonprobate asset under this chapter must be in a form substantially similar to the following:
NOTICE OF TESTAMENTARY
DISPOSITION OF NONPROBATE ASSET
The undersigned personal representative, petitioner for appointment as personal representative, attorney for the personal representative or petitioner, or testamentary beneficiary under the will of the decedent named above (as that term is defined in RCW 11.11.010) hereby notifies you that the decedent named above died on (DATE MUST BE SUPPLIED) and left a will dated (DATE OF WILL MUST BE SUPPLIED) disposing of the following nonprobate asset or assets in your possession or control:
(EACH SUCH ASSET MUST BE DESCRIBED WITH REASONABLE SPECIFICITY. FOR ACCOUNTS AT FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS, THE WRITTEN NOTICE MUST SPECIFY THE OFFICE AT WHICH THE ACCOUNT WAS MAINTAINED, THE NAME OR NAMES IN WHICH THE ACCOUNT WAS HELD, AND THE FULL ACCOUNT NUMBER. FOR ASSETS HELD IN TRUST, THE WRITTEN NOTICE MUST SPECIFY THE NAME OR NAMES OF THE GRANTOR, THE NAME OF THE TRUST, IF ANY, AND THE DATE OF THE TRUST INSTRUMENT.)
Under chapter 11.11 RCW, you may not transfer, deliver, or otherwise dispose of the asset or assets listed above in accordance with the beneficiary designation, account registration, or other arrangement made with you by the decedent. You may transfer, deliver, or otherwise dispose of the asset or assets listed above only upon receipt of the written direction of the personal representative or of the testamentary beneficiary, if the personal representative consents.
 
. . . .
 
. . . .
 
(CAPACITY OF SIGNER)
(3) The personal representative of the estate of the owner, a petitioner for appointment as personal representative, or the testamentary beneficiary may provide written notice under this section. The personal representative has no duty to provide written notice under this section and has no liability for failing or refusing to give the notice.
(4) Written notice under this section may be provided at any time after the death of the owner and before discharge of the personal representative on closing of the estate, and may be provided before admission to probate of the will.
[ 1998 c 292 s 109.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2008–2013 · leading case: Manary v. Anderson, 292 P.3d 96 (Wash. 2013).
Manary v. Anderson, 292 P.3d 96 (Wash. 2013). · cites it 2× “” But RCW 11.11.050(1) protects financial institutions and other third persons who control the nonprobate asset and “follow! ] the terms of the instrument as it appears, rather than the will of which it may have no knowledge.”
Certif. From US for Ninth Cir. v. Kachman, 198 P.3d 505 (Wash. 2008). “090; RCW 11.11.050; RCW 11.56.110; RCW 11.88.040; RCW 12.”
Cornhusker Cas. Ins. v. Kachman, 165 Wash. 2d 404 (Wash. 2008). “090; RCW 11.11.050; RCW 11.56.110; RCW 11.88.040; RCW 12.”
Manary v. Anderson, 164 Wash. App. 569 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “¶33 Next, Manary argues that even if Homer’s interest in the property is a nonprobate asset, Anderson is not entitled to it because he did not properly notify Manary or the trust under RCW 11.11.050(1). This argument is not persuasive.”
MANARY v. Anderson, 265 P.3d 163 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 2× “¶ 33 Next, Manary argues that, even if Homer's interest in the property is a nonprobate asset, Anderson is not entitled to it because he did not properly notify Manary or the trust under RCW 11.11.050(1). This argument is not persuasive.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 11.11.050(1) — 3 cases
Manary v. Anderson, 292 P.3d 96 (Wash. 2013). “” But RCW 11.11.050(1) protects financial institutions and other third persons who control the nonprobate asset and “follow! ] the terms of the instrument as it appears, rather than the will of which it may have no knowledge.”
Manary v. Anderson, 164 Wash. App. 569 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “¶33 Next, Manary argues that even if Homer’s interest in the property is a nonprobate asset, Anderson is not entitled to it because he did not properly notify Manary or the trust under RCW 11.11.050(1). This argument is not persuasive.”
MANARY v. Anderson, 265 P.3d 163 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). “¶ 33 Next, Manary argues that, even if Homer's interest in the property is a nonprobate asset, Anderson is not entitled to it because he did not properly notify Manary or the trust under RCW 11.11.050(1). This argument is not persuasive.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.