Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 11.76.250 (2026)
Letters after final settlement
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
A final settlement of the estate shall not prevent a subsequent issuance of letters of administration, should other property of the estate be discovered, or if it should become necessary and proper from any cause that letters should be again issued.
[ 1965 c 145 s 11.76.250. Prior: 1917 c 156 s 180; RRS s 1550; prior: Code 1881 s 1603; 1854 p 304 s 224.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1980–2023 · leading case: Barros v. Barros, 613 P.2d 547 (Wash. Ct. App. 1980).
Barros v. Barros, 613 P.2d 547 (Wash. Ct. App. 1980). “Rita perhaps could have secured subsequent letters of administration under RCW 11.76.250; however, it appears that she did not do so.”
In Re The Est. Of Gordon Ochs (Wash. Ct. App. 2023). “2 The petition was made under RCW 11.76.250, which provides: “A final settlement of the estate shall not prevent a subsequent issuance of letters of administration .”
Kevin Grudzinski v. Randy Grudzinski, et ux (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “See RCW 11.76.250. But in the meantime, Ms. Grudzinski's negligence claim dbes not belong to Kevin.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.