Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 11.98.009 (2026)

Application of chapter

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
Except as provided in this section, this chapter applies to express trusts executed by the trustor after June 10, 1959, and does not apply to resulting trusts, constructive trusts, business trusts where certificates of beneficial interest are issued to the beneficiary, investment trusts, voting trusts, trusts in the nature of mortgages or pledges, liquidation trusts, or trusts for the sole purpose of paying dividends, interest, interest coupons, salaries, wages, pensions or profits, trusts created in deposits in any financial institution pursuant to *chapter 30.22 RCW, unless any such trust which is created in writing incorporates this chapter in whole or in part.
[ 2011 c 327 s 14; 1985 c 30 s 40. Prior: 1984 c 149 s 67; 1983 c 3 s 49; 1959 c 124 s 1. Formerly RCW 30.99.010.]

Notes:

*Reviser's note: Chapter 30.22 RCW was recodified as chapter 30A.22 RCW pursuant to 2014 c 37 s 4, effective January 5, 2015.
ApplicationEffective date2011 c 327: See notes following RCW 11.103.020.
Short titleApplicationPurposeSeverability1985 c 30: See RCW 11.02.900 through 11.02.903.
SeverabilityEffective dates1984 c 149: See notes following RCW 11.02.005.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–2019 · leading case: Gillespie v. Seattle-First Nat'l Bank, 855 P.2d 680 (Wash. Ct. App. 1993).
Gillespie v. Seattle-First Nat'l Bank, 855 P.2d 680 (Wash. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 2× “060(1) excludes from its coverage any trust not defined as an "express" trust under RCW 11.98.009. RCW 11.98.009 excludes from the definition of "express" trusts all resulting trusts and constructive trusts, together with a lengthy list of other types of trusts not here relevant.”
Austin v. U.S. Bank, 869 P.2d 404 (Wash. Ct. App. 1994). “009, but including all express trusts, whenever executed, for any breach of fiduciary duty, must be brought within three years from the earlier of (a) the time the alleged breach was discovered or reasonably should have been discovered, (b) the discharge of a trustee from the…”
North Oakes Manor, App/cross/resp v. 2nd Half Llc, Res/cross-app (Wash. Ct. App. 2019). “RCW 11.98.009. An express trust is created only if the trustor has capacity to create a trust, indicates an intention to create the trust, and the trust has a definite beneficiary.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.