Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 11.98.200 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Due to the inherent conflict of interest that exists between a trustee and a beneficiary of a trust, unless the terms of a trust refer specifically to RCW 11.98.200 through 11.98.240 and provide expressly to the contrary, the powers conferred upon a trustee who is a beneficiary of the trust, other than the trustor as a trustee, cannot be exercised by the trustee to make:
(1) Discretionary distributions of either principal or income to or for the benefit of the trustee, except to provide for the trustee's health, education, maintenance, or support as described under section 2041 or 2514 of the Internal Revenue Code and the applicable regulations adopted under that section;
(2) Discretionary allocations of receipts or expenses as between principal and income, unless the trustee acts in a fiduciary capacity whereby the trustee has no power to enlarge or shift a beneficial interest except as an incidental consequence of the discharge of the trustee's fiduciary duties; or
(3) Discretionary distributions of either principal or income to satisfy a legal obligation of the trustee.
A proscribed power under this section that is conferred upon two or more trustees may be exercised by the trustees that are not disqualified under this section. If there is no trustee qualified to exercise a power proscribed under this section, a person described in RCW 11.96A.080 who is entitled to seek judicial proceedings with respect to a trust may apply to a court of competent jurisdiction to appoint another trustee who would not be disqualified, and the power may be exercised by another trustee appointed by the court. Alternatively, another trustee who would not be disqualified may be appointed in accordance with the provisions of the trust instrument if the procedures are provided, or as set forth in RCW 11.98.039 as if the office of trustee were vacant, or by a nonjudicial dispute resolution agreement under RCW 11.96A.220.
Notes:
Effective date—1999 c 42: See RCW 11.96A.902.
Application—1994 c 221: "The 1994 c 221 amendments to RCW 11.98.200(3) are remedial in nature and apply retroactively to July 25, 1993." [ 1994 c 221 s 74.]
Effective dates—1994 c 221: See note following RCW 11.100.035.
Severability—1993 c 339: "If any provision of this act or its application to any person or circumstance is held invalid, the remainder of the act or the application of the provision to other persons or circumstances is not affected." [ 1993 c 339 s 14.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2017–2021 · leading case: Kimberly Hansen v. Mark Rozgay Et, Al (Wash. Ct. App. 2017).
Kimberly Hansen v. Mark Rozgay Et, Al (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “See RCW 11.98.200. As a remainder beneficiary of the Cordes trust, Hansen has standing to bring a claim that Rozgay breached his duty as trustee.”
Kimberly Hansen v. Mark Rozgay Et, Al (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “See RCW 11.98.200. As a remainder beneficiary of the Cordes trust, Hansen has standing to bring a claim that Rozgay breached his duty as trustee.”
In Re Joanne K Blankenship Survivor's Trust (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “Since the 13 In support of his argument that the trial court erred in denying his summary judgment motion, Nathan asserts that there is an inherent conflict of interest under RCW 11.98.200 since the Cotrustees are also beneficiaries and since they unilaterally determined that…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.