Wash. Rev. Code § 13.34.260

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) In an attempt to minimize the inherent intrusion in the lives of families involved in the foster care system and to maintain parental authority where appropriate, the department, absent good cause, shall follow the wishes of the natural parent regarding the placement of the child with a relative or other suitable person pursuant to RCW 13.34.130. Preferences such as family constellation, sibling relationships, ethnicity, and religion shall be considered when matching children to foster homes. Parental authority is appropriate in areas that are not connected with the abuse or neglect that resulted in the dependency and shall be integrated through the foster care team.
(2) When a child is placed in out-of-home care, relatives, other suitable persons, and foster parents are encouraged to:
(a) Provide consultation to the foster care team based upon their experience with the child placed in their care;
(b) Assist the birth parents by helping them understand their child's needs and correlating appropriate parenting responses;
(c) Participate in educational activities, and enter into community-building activities with birth families and other foster families;
(d) Transport children to family time visits with birth families and assist children and their families in maximizing the purposefulness of family time.
(3) For purposes of this section:
(a) "Foster care team" means the relative, other suitable person, or foster parent currently providing care, the currently assigned department employee, and the parent or parents; and
(b) "Birth family" means the persons described in RCW 74.15.020(2)(a).
[ 2011 c 89 s 5; 2009 c 491 s 5; 2003 c 226 s 2; 2002 c 52 s 7; 2000 c 122 s 32; 1990 c 284 s 25.]

Notes:

Effective date2011 c 89: See note following RCW 18.320.005.
Findings2011 c 89: See RCW 18.320.005.
FindingsIntent2003 c 226: "The legislature finds that a large group of children spend a significant part of their lives in foster care. Each individual connected to a child in an out-of-home placement must have an abiding appreciation of the seriousness of the child's separation from his or her family and the past, whether that separation is short, long, or permanent in nature. It is the intent of the legislature to recognize and honor the history and the family connections that each child brings to an out-of-home placement.
The legislature finds that creating and sanctioning a connection between a child's birth parents and foster family, when appropriate, can result in better relationships among birth families, children, foster families, and social workers. Creating and sanctioning this connection can result in greater foster placement stability and fewer disruptions for children, as well as greater satisfaction for foster parents and social workers." [ 2003 c 226 s 1.]
Intent2002 c 52: See note following RCW 13.34.025.
FindingEffective date1990 c 284: See notes following RCW 74.13.250.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 13 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1992–2023 · leading case: Matter of Welfare of Key
Matter of Welfare of Key (1992) wash · cites it 8× “RCW 13.34.260 states: In an attempt to minimize the inherent intrusion in the lives of families involved in the foster care system and to maintain parental authority where appropriate, the department, absent good cause, shall follow the wishes of the natural parent regarding the…”
In re the Dependency of J.S. (2002) washctapp · cites it 3× “Jeffrey’s argument for a “good cause” requirement is derived from a related statute, RCW 13.34.260. In an attempt to minimize the inherent intrusion in the lives of families involved in the foster care system and to maintain parental authority where appropriate, the department,…”
In Re Dependency of JS (2002) washctapp · cites it 3× “Jeffrey's argument for a "good cause" requirement is derived from a related statute, RCW 13.34.260. In an attempt to minimize the inherent intrusion in the lives of families involved in the foster care system and to maintain parental authority where appropriate, the department,…”
In Re The Dependency Of: Z.A. (2023) washctapp · cites it 2× “Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s placement decision in the disposition order and remand for the accordance with RCW 13.34.260.” RCW 13.34.260 provides that “[p]references such as family constellation, sibling relationships, ethnicity, and religion shall be considered…”
In Re Custody of SHB (2003) washctapp “[26] RCW 13.34.260 states that "[p]arental authority is appropriate in areas that are not connected with the abuse or neglect that resulted in the dependency.”
Luby v. Dasilva (2003) washctapp “RCW 13.34.260 states that “[p]arental authority is appropriate in areas that are not connected with the abuse or neglect that resulted in the dependency.”
In Re Dependency of JW (1998) washctapp “RCW 13.34.260 provides that DSHS should normally follow the natural parent’s wishes and consider family members and ethnicity when placing the child in foster care.”
In Re The Dependency Of: J.d.p. And J.d.p. (2021) washctapp “210 (when a child is not immediately adopted after termination, Department must take reasonable steps to ensure sibling relationships); and RCW 13.34.260 (preferences for sibling relationships must be considered when matching children to foster homes).”
In Re Placement of RJ (2000) washctapp “2d 200 ; RCW 13.34.260. This is still the procedure for dependencies.”
In re R.J. (2000) washctapp “2d at 611 ; RCW 13.34.260. This is still the procedure for dependencies.”
In Re The Dependency Of: Z.a. (2023) washctapp · cites it 2× “130(2), which states “Absent good cause, the department shall follow the wishes of the natural parent regarding the placement of the child in accordance with RCW 13.34.260.” RCW 13.34.260 provides that “[p]references such as family constellation, sibling relationships,…”
In Re The Dependency Of: Z.A. (2023) washctapp · cites it 2× “Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s placement decision in the disposition order and remand for the accordance with RCW 13.34.260.” RCW 13.34.260 provides that “[p]references such as family constellation, sibling relationships, ethnicity, and religion shall be considered…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.