Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 13.40.192 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) If a juvenile is ordered to pay restitution, the money judgment remains enforceable for a period of 10 years. When the juvenile reaches the age of 18 years or at the conclusion of juvenile court jurisdiction, whichever occurs later, the superior court clerk must docket the remaining balance of the juvenile's restitution in the same manner as other judgments for the payment of money. The judgment remains valid and enforceable until 10 years from the date of its imposition. The clerk of the superior court may seek extension of the judgment for restitution in the same manner as RCW 6.17.020 for purposes of collection as allowed under RCW 36.18.190.
(2)(a) A judgment against a juvenile for any legal financial obligation other than restitution including, but not limited to, fines, penalty assessments, attorneys' fees, court costs, and other administrative fees, is not enforceable after July 1, 2023. The superior court clerk shall not accept payments from a respondent who was ordered to pay legal financial obligations, including fines, penalty assessments, attorneys' fees, and court costs after July 1, 2023. Any such debts shall be rendered null and void, and considered satisfied and paid in full by July 1, 2027, according to the following schedule:
(i) By June 30, 2025, debts resulting from cases filed from July 1, 2018, through June 30, 2023;
(ii) By June 30, 2026, debts resulting from cases filed from July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2018; and
(iii) By June 30, 2027, debts resulting from cases filed prior to July 1, 2013.
(b) Nothing in this section shall prevent a court from granting individual relief at any time in response to a motion.
(c) The presiding judge of a superior court may at any time authorize an administrative process to waive outstanding debt for any uncollectible legal financial obligation, other than restitution, imposed against a juvenile. The administrative process must ensure that debts:
(i) Are waived within any statutorily required deadlines;
(ii) Do not affect an individual's credit;
(iii) Are recalled from any collections agency; and
(iv) Do not appear in any background check.
(d) For the purposes of this section, the clerk of the superior court may seek a judicial order to waive outstanding debt for any uncollectible legal financial obligations, other than restitution, in the same manner as the clerk is authorized to seek an extension of jurisdiction under RCW 6.17.020 for purposes of collection as allowed under RCW 36.18.190. Any motion filed by the clerk of the superior court under this section does not constitute the practice of law.
Notes:
Effective date—2023 c 449: See note following RCW 13.40.058.
Finding—Intent—2015 c 265: See note following RCW 13.50.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 6
cases (1 in the last 5 years), 2010–2024 · leading case: State v. Hamedian, 354 P.3d 937 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).
State v. Hamedian, 354 P.3d 937 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “Hamedian contends that because the 1997 restitution order is no longer enforceable as a money judgment under former RCW 13.40.192 (1997) 2 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977, he is entitled to an order sealing his juvenile records under former RCW 13.”
In Re Brady, 224 P.3d 842 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “The court may determine the amount, terms, and conditions of the restitution including a payment plan extending up to ten years if the court determines that the respondent does not have the means to make full restitution over a shorter period.”
In re the Pers. Restraint of Brady, 154 Wash. App. 189 (Wash. Ct. App. 2010). “The court may determine the amount, terms, and conditions of the restitution including a payment plan extending up to ten years if the court determines that the respondent does not have the means to make full restitution over a shorter period.”
State Of Washington v. Esteban Joel Flores, 374 P.3d 222 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “The State contends that the trial court may order costs under RCW 13.40.192. We agree with the State. ¶28 Whenever a person is convicted in superior court, the trial court may order the payment of legal financial obligations as part of the sentence.”
State Of Washington v. A. H. (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “71253-5-1/2 former RCW 13.40.192 (1997)2 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977, he is entitled to an order sealing his juvenile records under former RCW 13.”
State of Washington v. D.G.A. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “Kunes, Grant County Clerk, pursuant to RCW 13.40.192; the defendant having attained the age of eighteen (18) on 8/25/01, the defendant owes legal financial obligations, including restitution, in the amount of $613.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 13.40.192(1) — 1 case
State Of Washington v. Esteban Joel Flores, 374 P.3d 222 (Wash. Ct. App. 2016). “The State contends that the trial court may order costs under RCW 13.40.192. We agree with the State. ¶28 Whenever a person is convicted in superior court, the trial court may order the payment of legal financial obligations as part of the sentence.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 13.40.192(2) — 2 cases
State v. Hamedian, 354 P.3d 937 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “Hamedian contends that because the 1997 restitution order is no longer enforceable as a money judgment under former RCW 13.40.192 (1997) 2 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977, he is entitled to an order sealing his juvenile records under former RCW 13.”
State Of Washington v. A. H. (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “71253-5-1/2 former RCW 13.40.192 (1997)2 of the Juvenile Justice Act of 1977, he is entitled to an order sealing his juvenile records under former RCW 13.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.