Wash. Rev. Code » Title 18 · Chapter 18.130

Wash. Rev. Code § 18.130.100

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The procedures governing adjudicative proceedings before agencies under chapter 34.05 RCW, the Administrative Procedure Act, govern all hearings before the disciplining authority. The disciplining authority has, in addition to the powers and duties set forth in this chapter, all of the powers and duties under chapter 34.05 RCW, which include, without limitation, all powers relating to the administration of oaths, the receipt of evidence, the issuance and enforcing of subpoenas, and the taking of depositions.
[ 1989 c 175 s 69; 1984 c 279 s 10.]

Notes:

Effective date—1989 c 175: See note following RCW 34.05.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 22 cases (4 in the last 5 years), 1998–2026 · leading case: Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR.
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Nguyen v. STATE HEALTH MED. QUALITY ASSUR. (2001) wash · cites it 3× “The UDA, RCW 18.130.100, states all hearings before the disciplinary authority are governed by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).”
Nguyen v. Department of Health (2001) wash · cites it 3× “The UDA, RCW 18.130.100, states all hearings before the disciplinary authority are governed by the Administrative Procedure Act (APA).”
Clausing v. State (1998) washctapp · cites it 2× “See RCW 18.130.100. And the uniform procedural rules adopted by the Department of Health (Department) also apply to UDA adjudicative proceedings.”
Clausing v. State (1998) washctapp · cites it 2× “See RCW 18.130.100. And the uniform procedural rules adopted by the Department of Health("Department") also apply to UDA adjudicative proceedings.”
Ongom v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH (2005) washctapp “[37] RCW 18.130.100; RCW 34.05.446(3), .449, .”
Ancier v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH (2007) washctapp “3d 689 (2001) as an opportunity to fashion a new and higher standard of review for appeals in medical disciplinary proceedings.”
Ongom v. Department of Health (2005) washctapp “RCW 18.130.100; RCW 34.05.446(3), .449, .”
Ancier v. Department of Health (2007) washctapp “Nguyen clarified the standard of proof but does not address the standard of appellate review, which is established by the legislature.”
Seymour v. STATE DEPT. OF HEALTH, DQAC (2009) washctapp “RCW 18.130.100. The APA provides that "[t]he presiding officer [of a disciplinary hearing] shall exclude evidence that is excludable on constitutional or statutory grounds.”
Seymour v. Department of Health, Dental Quality Assurance Commission (2009) washctapp “RCW 18.130.100. The APA provides that “[t]he presiding officer [of a disciplinary hearing] shall exclude evidence that is excludable on constitutional or statutory grounds.”
Alsager v. Board of Osteopathic Medicine & Surgery (2013) wawd · cites it 2× “RCW § 18.130.100. If an adverse decision is issued against a physician, that decision may be challenged in Washington’s superior courts and if necessary, appealed to the state appellate courts.”
Nguyen v. Department of Health (1999) washctapp · cites it 2× “See RCW 18.130.100. *101 The APA delineates judicial review of administrative agency actions.”
Show all 22 citing cases →
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.