Wash. Rev. Code » Title 23B · Chapter 23B.14
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 23B.14.220 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) A corporation administratively dissolved under RCW 23.95.610 may apply to the secretary of state for reinstatement in accordance with RCW 23.95.615.
[ 2015 c 176 s 2128; 2006 c 52 s 13; 1995 c 47 s 2; 1989 c 165 s 162.]

Notes:

Effective date—Contingent effective date—2015 c 176: See note following RCW 23.95.100.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 4 cases, 1996–2015 · leading case: Innerspace Floor Coverings, Inc., App. v. Janet L. Hill, Resp., 361 P.3d 195 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Innerspace Floor Coverings, Inc., App. v. Janet L. Hill, Resp., 361 P.3d 195 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “RCW 23B.14.220. 4 If reinstatement is granted, it relates back to the effective *903 date of the administrative dissolution and the corporation carries on as if the administrative dissolution had never occurred.”
Equipto Div. Aurora Equip. Co. v. Yarmouth, 950 P.2d 451 (Wash. 1998). “Reinstatement related back to the effective date of the original dissolution, and the corporation resumed its business as if the dissolution had never occurred. RCW 23B.”
Equipto Div. Aurora Equip. v. Yarmouth, 950 P.2d 451 (Wash. 1998). · cites it 6× “There is no question that an individual acting on behalf of a corporation that has been administratively dissolved, but reinstated during the two-year window under RCW 23B.14.220, will not be personally liable for acts that occurred during the temporary dissolution.”
Equipto Div. Aurora Equip. Co. v. Yarmouth, 924 P.2d 405 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996). “17 Former RCW 23B.14.220(1); Laws op 1989, ch. 165, § 162, effective July 1, 1990.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 23B.14.220(1) — 2 cases
Equipto Div. Aurora Equip. Co. v. Yarmouth, 924 P.2d 405 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996). “17 Former RCW 23B.14.220(1); Laws op 1989, ch. 165, § 162, effective July 1, 1990.”
Equipto Div. Aurora Equip. v. Yarmouth, 950 P.2d 451 (Wash. 1998). “There is no question that an individual acting on behalf of a corporation that has been administratively dissolved, but reinstated during the two-year window under RCW 23B.14.220, will not be personally liable for acts that occurred during the temporary dissolution.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 23B.14.220(2) — 1 case
Equipto Div. Aurora Equip. v. Yarmouth, 950 P.2d 451 (Wash. 1998). “There is no question that an individual acting on behalf of a corporation that has been administratively dissolved, but reinstated during the two-year window under RCW 23B.14.220, will not be personally liable for acts that occurred during the temporary dissolution.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 23B.14.220(3) — 3 cases
Equipto Div. Aurora Equip. Co. v. Yarmouth, 950 P.2d 451 (Wash. 1998). “Reinstatement related back to the effective date of the original dissolution, and the corporation resumed its business as if the dissolution had never occurred. RCW 23B.”
Innerspace Floor Coverings, Inc., App. v. Janet L. Hill, Resp., 361 P.3d 195 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “RCW 23B.14.220. 4 If reinstatement is granted, it relates back to the effective *903 date of the administrative dissolution and the corporation carries on as if the administrative dissolution had never occurred.”
Equipto Div. Aurora Equip. v. Yarmouth, 950 P.2d 451 (Wash. 1998). “There is no question that an individual acting on behalf of a corporation that has been administratively dissolved, but reinstated during the two-year window under RCW 23B.14.220, will not be personally liable for acts that occurred during the temporary dissolution.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.