Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 26.21A.905 (2026)
Uniformity of application and construction
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
In applying and construing this chapter, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.
[ 2002 c 198 s 903.]
Notes:
Effective date—2002 c 198: See RCW 26.21A.900.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 2011–2016 · leading case: Bell v. Heflin, 383 P.3d 1031 (Wash. 2016).
Bell v. Heflin, 383 P.3d 1031 (Wash. 2016). “RCW 26.21A.905 emphasizes that in applying and construing UIFSA, “consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”
In re the Marriage of Schneider, 268 P.3d 215 (Wash. 2011). “¶37 Because this is a matter of first impression in Washington of interpreting a uniform law adopted by all 50 states, we may consider how these other states have addressed the issue.”
In re Paternity of M.H. (Wash. 2016). “RCW 26.21A.905 emphasizes that in applying and construing UIFSA, "consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.