Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 26.21A.905 (2026)

Uniformity of application and construction

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
In applying and construing this chapter, consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.
[ 2002 c 198 s 903.]

Notes:

Effective date2002 c 198: See RCW 26.21A.900.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2016 · leading case: Bell v. Heflin, 383 P.3d 1031 (Wash. 2016).
Bell v. Heflin, 383 P.3d 1031 (Wash. 2016). · cites it 2× “RCW 26.21A.905 emphasizes that in applying and construing UIFSA, “consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”
In re the Marriage of Schneider, 268 P.3d 215 (Wash. 2011). “¶37 Because this is a matter of first impression in Washington of interpreting a uniform law adopted by all 50 states, we may consider how these other states have addressed the issue.”
In re Paternity of M.H. (Wash. 2016). · cites it 2× “RCW 26.21A.905 emphasizes that in applying and construing UIFSA, "consideration must be given to the need to promote uniformity of the law with respect to its subject matter among states that enact it.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.