Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 28A.155.050 (2026)
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
Any child who is eligible for special education services through special excess cost aid programs authorized under RCW 28A.155.010 through 28A.155.160 shall be given such services in the least restrictive environment as determined by the student's individualized education program (IEP) team in the school district in which such student resides. Any school district required to provide such services shall thereupon be granted regular apportionment of state and county school funds and, in addition, allocations from state excess funds made available for such special services for such period of time as such special education program is given: PROVIDED, That should such student or any other student with disabilities attend and participate in a special education program operated by another school district in accordance with the provisions of RCW 28A.225.210, 28A.225.220, and/or 28A.225.250, such regular apportionment shall be granted to the receiving school district, and such receiving school district shall be reimbursed by the district in which such student resides in accordance with rules adopted by the superintendent of public instruction for the entire approved excess cost not reimbursed from such regular apportionment.
[ 2007 c 115 s 5; 1995 c 77 s 11; 1990 c 33 s 124; 1971 ex.s. c 66 s 5; 1969 ex.s. c 223 s 28A.13.040. Prior: 1943 c 120 s 5; Rem. Supp. 1943 s 4679-29. Formerly RCW 28A.13.040, 28.13.040.]
Notes:
Severability—Effective date—1971 ex.s. c 66: See notes following RCW 28A.155.010.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1
case, 2010–2010 · leading case: Sch. Districts'All. v. State, 244 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2010).
Sch. Districts'All. v. State, 244 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2010). “" RCW 28A.155.050 (emphasis added). "The superintendent of public *7 instruction, by rule, shall establish for the purpose of excess cost funding .”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.