Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.416 (2026)
Decision not to conduct an adjudication
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
If an agency decides not to conduct an adjudicative proceeding in response to an application, the agency shall furnish the applicant a copy of its decision in writing, with a brief statement of the agency's reasons and of any administrative review available to the applicant.
[ 1988 c 288 s 403.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5
cases (2 in the last 5 years), 2006–2021 · leading case: Eric Johnson, Apps/cross-resp v. Wa State Conservation Comm., Resps/cross-app (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).
Eric Johnson, Apps/cross-resp v. Wa State Conservation Comm., Resps/cross-app (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “See RCW 34.05.416. The Commission held the removal hearing over the appellants’ objections in February 2019.”
Jason L. Watson v. City of Spokane (Wash. Ct. App. 2017). “416, Watson's claim by finding that Watson forfeited the money pursuant to his stipulation.”
All Nat. Herbs, Llc, V. State Liquor & Cannabis Bd. (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “ection, the agency shall do one of the following: (a) Approve or deny the application, in whole or in part, on the basis of brief or emergency adjudicative proceedings, if those proceedings are available under this chapter for disposition of the matter; (b) Commence an…”
Janet Saarela v. State Of Washington Dep't Of Soc. & Health Servs. (Wash. Ct. App. 2014). “14 RCW 34.05.416 provides in full: Decision not to conduct an adjudication.”
Lawrence v. Dep't of Health, 138 P.3d 124 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “RCW 34.05.416 (Decision not to conduct an adjudication).”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.