Wash. Rev. Code » Title 34 · Chapter 34.05
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.530 (2026)

Standing

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency action. A person is aggrieved or adversely affected within the meaning of this section only when all three of the following conditions are present:
(1) The agency action has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person;
(2) That person's asserted interests are among those that the agency was required to consider when it engaged in the agency action challenged; and
(3) A judgment in favor of that person would substantially eliminate or redress the prejudice to that person caused or likely to be caused by the agency action.
[ 1988 c 288 s 506.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 60 cases (13 in the last 5 years), 1990–2026 · leading case: Allan v. Univ. of Washington, 140 Wash. 2d 323 (Wash. 2000).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Allan v. Univ. of Washington, 140 Wash. 2d 323 (Wash. 2000). · cites it 16× “The Court of Appeals analyzed Allan’s claim under the APA standing rule, RCW 34.05.530: A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency action.”
Allan v. Univ. of Washington, 997 P.2d 360 (Wash. 2000). · cites it 16× “The Court of Appeals analyzed Allan's claim under the APA standing rule, RCW 34.05.530: A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency action.”
Seattle Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Apprenticeship & Training Council, 920 P.2d 581 (Wash. 1996). · cites it 4× “” RCW 34.05.530. A person is so aggrieved or adversely affected when: (1) The agency action has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person; (2) That person’s asserted interests are among those that the agency was required to consider when it engaged in the agency action…”
Chelan Cnty. v. Nykreim, 52 P.3d 1 (Wash. 2002). · cites it 2× “Comparing the standing provisions of the APA, RCW 34.05.530, with the standing provisions of LUPA, RCW 36.”
Chelan Cnty. v. Nykreim, 146 Wash. 2d 904 (Wash. 2002). · cites it 2× “Comparing the standing provisions of the APA, RCW 34.05.530, with the standing provisions of LUPA, RCW 36.”
City of Burlington v. Washington State Liquor Control Bd., 351 P.3d 875 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). · cites it 4× “A person is aggrieved or adversely affected within the meaning of this section only when all three of the following conditions are present: (1) The agency action has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person; (2) That person’s asserted interests are among those that the…”
KS Tacoma Holdings, LLC v. Shorelines Hearings Bd., 166 Wash. App. 117 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “RCW 34.05.530. ¶15 These statutory standing conditions are largely drawn from federal case law, and the APA expressly states the legislature’s intent that “courts should interpret provisions of [chapter 34.”
Patterson v. Segale, 289 P.3d 657 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 3× “” 4 RCW 34.05.530. A person is “aggrieved or adversely affected” only where all of the following conditions are present: (1) The agency action has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person; (2) That person’s asserted interests are among those that the agency was required…”
Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. Dep't of Revenue, 271 P.3d 268 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). · cites it 2× “¶41 RCW 34.05.530 provides: A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency *362 action.”
St. Joseph Hosp. & Health Care Ctr. v. Dep't of Health, 887 P.2d 891 (Wash. 1995). · cites it 2× “Under RCW 34.05.530, only a person who is "aggrieved or adversely affected” by an agency action has standing to obtain judicial review of the action.”
New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC v. City of Clyde Hill, 185 Wash. 2d 594 (Wash. 2016). “RCW 34.05.530. A petitioner must file for judicial review of an agency’s final order within 30 days.”
Kittitas Cnty. v. Kittitas Cnty. Conservation Coalition, 308 P.3d 745 (Wash. Ct. App. 2013). “Even if Futurewise were required to use some other administrative appeal before petitioning the hearings board, the procedure the County and Ellison suggest was not available to Futurewise. ¶22 While a party may appeal the County’s SEPA action to the county commissioners, this…”
Show all 60 citing cases →
— Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.530(1) — 6 cases
Allan v. Univ. of Washington, 997 P.2d 360 (Wash. 2000). “The Court of Appeals analyzed Allan's claim under the APA standing rule, RCW 34.05.530: A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency action.”
Allan v. Univ. of Washington, 140 Wash. 2d 323 (Wash. 2000). “The Court of Appeals analyzed Allan’s claim under the APA standing rule, RCW 34.05.530: A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency action.”
City of Burlington v. Washington State Liquor Control Bd., 351 P.3d 875 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “A person is aggrieved or adversely affected within the meaning of this section only when all three of the following conditions are present: (1) The agency action has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person; (2) That person’s asserted interests are among those that the…”
Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., App./cross-res. V. Wa State Health Care Auth., Res./cross-app., 497 P.3d 454 (Wash. Ct. App. 2021).
Durham Sch. Servs. Lp, V. State Dep't Of Revenue (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.530(2) — 6 cases
Seattle Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. Apprenticeship & Training Council, 920 P.2d 581 (Wash. 1996). “” RCW 34.05.530. A person is so aggrieved or adversely affected when: (1) The agency action has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person; (2) That person’s asserted interests are among those that the agency was required to consider when it engaged in the agency action…”
Allan v. Univ. of Washington, 140 Wash. 2d 323 (Wash. 2000). “The Court of Appeals analyzed Allan’s claim under the APA standing rule, RCW 34.05.530: A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency action.”
Allan v. Univ. of Washington, 997 P.2d 360 (Wash. 2000). “The Court of Appeals analyzed Allan's claim under the APA standing rule, RCW 34.05.530: A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency action.”
Seattle Bldg. Council v. Appren. Council, 920 P.2d 581 (Wash. 1996).
Twin Harbor Fish & Wildlife, V State Fish & Wildlife (Wash. Ct. App. 2022).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.530(3) — 7 cases
KS Tacoma Holdings, LLC v. Shorelines Hearings Bd., 166 Wash. App. 117 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “RCW 34.05.530. ¶15 These statutory standing conditions are largely drawn from federal case law, and the APA expressly states the legislature’s intent that “courts should interpret provisions of [chapter 34.”
City of Burlington v. Washington State Liquor Control Bd., 351 P.3d 875 (Wash. Ct. App. 2015). “A person is aggrieved or adversely affected within the meaning of this section only when all three of the following conditions are present: (1) The agency action has prejudiced or is likely to prejudice that person; (2) That person’s asserted interests are among those that the…”
Durham Sch. Servs. Lp, V. State Dep't Of Revenue (Wash. Ct. App. 2026).
Est. Of David Lynch, App V. Washington Healthcare Auth., Resp (Wash. Ct. App. 2023).
Benton Cnty. Water Conservancy Bd. v. Dep't of Ecology (Wash. 2024).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 34.05.530(l) — 1 case
Allan v. Univ. of Washington, 140 Wash. 2d 323 (Wash. 2000). “The Court of Appeals analyzed Allan’s claim under the APA standing rule, RCW 34.05.530: A person has standing to obtain judicial review of agency action if that person is aggrieved or adversely affected by the agency action.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.