Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 36.26.090 (2026)
Appointment of attorney other than public defender
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
For good cause shown, or in any case involving a crime of widespread notoriety, the court may, upon its own motion or upon application of either the public defender or of the indigent accused, appoint an attorney other than the public defender to represent the accused at any stage of the proceedings or on appeal: PROVIDED, That the public defender may represent an accused, not an indigent, in any case of public notoriety where the court may find that adequate retained counsel is not available. The court shall award, and the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed shall pay, such attorney reasonable compensation and reimbursement for any expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred in the presentation of the accused's defense or appeal, in accordance with RCW 4.88.330.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3
cases, 1995–2006 · leading case: State v. Perala, 132 Wash. App. 98 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006).
State v. Perala, 132 Wash. App. 98 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “This provision further provides that: The court shall award, and the county in which the offense is alleged to have been committed shall pay, such attorney reasonable compensation and reimbursement for any expenses reasonably and necessarily incurred in the presentation of the…”
In Re Dependency of Grove, 897 P.2d 1252 (Wash. 1995). “Moreover, the Legislature has expressly distinguished "any stage of the proceedings" from "appeal" in another statute having to do with appointed counsel for indigents.”
State v. Perala, 130 P.3d 852 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). “090 also permits a trial court on its own motion, and for good cause *861 shown, to appoint an attorney who is not a public defender to represent an indigent accused at any stage of criminal proceedings and on appeal. This provision further provides that: The court shall award,…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.