Wash. Rev. Code » Title 36 · Chapter 36.70
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.70.430 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
When it deems it to be for the public interest, or when it considers a change in the recommendations of the planning agency to be necessary, the board may initiate consideration of a comprehensive plan, or any element or part thereof, or any change in or addition to such plan or recommendation. The board shall first refer the proposed plan, change or addition to the planning agency for a report and recommendation. Before making a report and recommendation, the commission shall hold at least one public hearing on the proposed plan, change or addition. Notice of the time and place and purpose of the hearing shall be given by one publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the county and in the official gazette, if any, of the county, at least ten days before the hearing.
[ 1963 c 4 s 36.70.430. Prior: 1959 c 201 s 43.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 2011–2011 · leading case: Brinnon Grp. v. Jefferson Cnty., 159 Wash. App. 446 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Brinnon Grp. v. Jefferson Cnty., 159 Wash. App. 446 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 13× “Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ¶37 Brinnon Group contends that the BOCC violated public participation requirements when it adopted the text amendment to the comprehensive plan.”
BRINNON Grp. v. Jefferson Cnty., 245 P.3d 789 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 13× “COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT ¶ 37 Brinnon Group contends that the BOCC violated public participation requirements when it adopted the text amendment to the comprehensive plan.”
Brinnon Grp. v. Jefferson Cnty., 245 P.3d 789 (Wash. Ct. App. 2011). · cites it 13× “COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TEXT AMENDMENT ¶ 37 Brinnon Group contends that the BOCC violated public participation requirements when it adopted the text amendment to the comprehensive plan.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.