Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 36.95.020 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A district's boundary may include any part or all of any county and may include any part or all of any incorporated area located within the county. A district's boundary may not include any territory already being served by a cable TV system (CATV) unless on August 9, 1971, there is a translator station retransmitting television signals to such territory.

[ 1991 c 363 s 98; 1971 ex.s. c 155 s 2.]

Notes:

Purpose—Captions not law—1991 c 363: See notes following RCW 2.32.180.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 1 case, 1980–1980 · leading case: City of Issaquah v. Teleprompter Corp., 611 P.2d 741 (Wash. 1980).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

City of Issaquah v. Teleprompter Corp., 611 P.2d 741 (Wash. 1980). · cites it 2× “RCW 36.95.020. This limitation is quite different from Teleprompter's assertion that code cities have no authority to operate cable television systems.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.