Revised Code of Washington
Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010 (2026)
Application of chapter
✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases:
SyfertCases citing this section
WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov
JustiaTitle on Justia
CornellLII Search
CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) In this section:
(a) "Goods or services" does not include the creation, dissemination, exhibition, or advertisement or similar promotion of a dramatic, literary, musical, political, journalistic, or artistic work.
(b) "Governmental unit" means a public corporation or government or governmental subdivision, agency, or instrumentality.
(c) "Person" means an individual, estate, trust, partnership, business or nonprofit entity, governmental unit, or other legal entity.
(2) Except as otherwise provided in subsection (3) of this section, this chapter applies to a cause of action asserted in a civil action against a person based on the person's:
(a) Communication in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding;
(b) Communication on an issue under consideration or review in a legislative, executive, judicial, administrative, or other governmental proceeding;
(c) Exercise of the right of freedom of speech or of the press, the right to assemble or petition, or the right of association, guaranteed by the United States Constitution or Washington state Constitution, on a matter of public concern.
(3)(a) Except when (b) of this subsection applies, this chapter does not apply to a cause of action asserted:
(i) Against a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting or purporting to act in an official capacity;
(ii) By a governmental unit or an employee or agent of a governmental unit acting in an official capacity to enforce a law to protect against an imminent threat to public health or safety;
(iii) Against a person primarily engaged in the business of selling or leasing goods or services if the cause of action arises out of a communication related to the person's sale or lease of the goods or services;
(iv) Against a person named in a civil suit brought by a victim of a crime against a perpetrator;
(v) Against a person named in a civil suit brought to establish or declare real property possessory rights, use of real property, recovery of real property, quiet title to real property, or related claims relating to real property;
(vi) Seeking recovery for bodily injury, wrongful death, or survival or to statements made regarding that legal action, unless the claims involve damage to reputation;
(vii) Brought under the insurance code or arising out of an insurance contract;
(viii) Based on a common law fraud claim;
(ix) Brought under Title 26 RCW, or counterclaims based on a criminal no-contact order pursuant to chapter 10.99 RCW, for or based on an antiharassment order under *chapter 10.14 RCW or RCW 9A.46.050, for or based on a sexual assault protection order under *chapter 7.90 RCW, or for or based on a vulnerable adult protection order under chapter 74.34 RCW;
(x) Brought under Title 49 RCW; negligent supervision, retention, or infliction of emotional distress unless the claims involve damage to reputation; wrongful discharge in violation of public policy; whistleblowing, including chapters 42.40 and 42.41 RCW; or enforcement of employee rights under civil service, collective bargaining, or handbooks and policies;
(xi) Brought under the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW; or
(xii) Any claim brought under federal law.
(b) This chapter applies to a cause of action asserted under (a)(iii), (viii), or (xi) of this subsection when the cause of action is:
(i) A legal action against a person arising from any act of that person, whether public or private, related to the gathering, receiving, posting, or processing of information for communication to the public, whether or not the information is actually communicated to the public, for the creation, dissemination, exhibition, or advertisement or other similar promotion of a dramatic, literary, musical, political, journalistic, or otherwise artistic work, including audiovisual work regardless of the means of distribution, a motion picture, a television or radio program, or an article published in a newspaper, website, magazine, or other platform, no matter the method or extent of distribution; or
(ii) A legal action against a person related to the communication, gathering, receiving, posting, or processing of consumer opinions or commentary, evaluations of consumer complaints, or reviews or ratings of businesses.
[ 2021 c 259 s 2.]
Notes:
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 18
cases (18 in the last 5 years), 2022–2026 · leading case: Thurman v. Cowles Co., 562 P.3d 777 (Wash. 2025).
Thurman v. Cowles Co., 562 P.3d 777 (Wash. 2025). “RCW 4.105.010. 2 Davis held that “‘[w]hen there is no genuine issue of material fact, … summary judgment proceedings do not infringe upon a litigant’s constitutional right to a jury trial.”
Valve Corp., V. Bucher Law, Pllc Et Ano (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “In ruling on such a motion, “the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action” if three requirements are met: (1) the defendant “establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that [UPEPA] applies”; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Dimension Townhouses, Llc., V. Leganieds, Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “RCW 4.105.010(2)(b)-(c). Dimension’s tortious interference claim is based on communications made by Leganieds to the City.”
TorchStar Corp v. Hyatech Inc (E.D. Wash. 2023). “1 Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010 (2). 2 There are certain exemptions that are enumerated in Wash.”
Ligeri v. Parker (W.D. Wash. 2025). “CODE § 4.105.010(2)” that 13 UPEPA applies; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under WASH REV.”
Jeffrey Thurman v. Cowles Co. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “The court must dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action if three conditions are met: (1) the moving party establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that the chapter applies, (2) the responding party fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Law Off. Of John Randolph, Pllc V. Ewu Media Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “He includes in his briefing a subheading that “[p]ublic concern is not on appeal.”
Proj. Veritas v. Leland Stanford Junior Univ. (W.D. Wash. 2022). “As is relevant 13 here, in ruling on such motion, the Court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action if: 14 (i) the moving party establishes that, under RCW 4.105.010(2), UPEPA applies, (ii) the 15 responding party fails to establish that, under RCW 4.”
Kurt Benshoof, V. Nathan Cliber (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “” RCW 4.105.010(2)(a). It does this by allowing parties to bring a special motion for expedited relief “to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action.”
Boshears v. PeopleConnect Inc (W.D. Wash. 2022). “” RCW 4.105.010(3)(a)(iii). 18 Classmates’ argument under UPEPA fails for two reasons.”
Montano v. State of Washington Dep't of Health (W.D. Wash. 2025). “Code 18 § 4.105.010(2)(c). 19 “It is the moving party's burden to establish that UPEPA applies to the cause of action.”
Micahn T. Carter v. Mary E. Jones (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “” RCW 4.105.010(2)(c). The moving party carries the burden to establish that the UPEPA applies to the cause of action.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(2) — 5 cases
Valve Corp., V. Bucher Law, Pllc Et Ano (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “In ruling on such a motion, “the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action” if three requirements are met: (1) the defendant “establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that [UPEPA] applies”; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Jeffrey Thurman v. Cowles Co. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “The court must dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action if three conditions are met: (1) the moving party establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that the chapter applies, (2) the responding party fails to establish under RCW 4.”
TorchStar Corp v. Hyatech Inc (E.D. Wash. 2023). “1 Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010 (2). 2 There are certain exemptions that are enumerated in Wash.”
Proj. Veritas v. Leland Stanford Junior Univ. (W.D. Wash. 2022). “As is relevant 13 here, in ruling on such motion, the Court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action if: 14 (i) the moving party establishes that, under RCW 4.105.010(2), UPEPA applies, (ii) the 15 responding party fails to establish that, under RCW 4.”
Ligeri v. Parker (W.D. Wash. 2025). “CODE § 4.105.010(2)” that 13 UPEPA applies; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under WASH REV.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(2)(a) — 1 case
Kurt Benshoof, V. Nathan Cliber (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “” RCW 4.105.010(2)(a). It does this by allowing parties to bring a special motion for expedited relief “to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(2)(b) — 2 cases
Dimension Townhouses, Llc., V. Leganieds, Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “RCW 4.105.010(2)(b)-(c). Dimension’s tortious interference claim is based on communications made by Leganieds to the City.”
Valve Corp., V. Bucher Law, Pllc Et Ano (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “In ruling on such a motion, “the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action” if three requirements are met: (1) the defendant “establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that [UPEPA] applies”; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under RCW 4.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(2)(c) — 9 cases
Thurman v. Cowles Co., 562 P.3d 777 (Wash. 2025). “RCW 4.105.010. 2 Davis held that “‘[w]hen there is no genuine issue of material fact, … summary judgment proceedings do not infringe upon a litigant’s constitutional right to a jury trial.”
Valve Corp., V. Bucher Law, Pllc Et Ano (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “In ruling on such a motion, “the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action” if three requirements are met: (1) the defendant “establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that [UPEPA] applies”; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Micahn T. Carter v. Mary E. Jones (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “” RCW 4.105.010(2)(c). The moving party carries the burden to establish that the UPEPA applies to the cause of action.”
Jeffrey Thurman v. Cowles Co. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “The court must dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action if three conditions are met: (1) the moving party establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that the chapter applies, (2) the responding party fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Dimension Townhouses, Llc., V. Leganieds, Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “RCW 4.105.010(2)(b)-(c). Dimension’s tortious interference claim is based on communications made by Leganieds to the City.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3) — 4 cases
Valve Corp., V. Bucher Law, Pllc Et Ano (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “In ruling on such a motion, “the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action” if three requirements are met: (1) the defendant “establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that [UPEPA] applies”; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Ligeri v. Parker (W.D. Wash. 2025). “CODE § 4.105.010(2)” that 13 UPEPA applies; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under WASH REV.”
Jeffrey Thurman v. Cowles Co. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “The court must dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action if three conditions are met: (1) the moving party establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that the chapter applies, (2) the responding party fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Proj. Veritas v. Leland Stanford Junior Univ. (W.D. Wash. 2022). “As is relevant 13 here, in ruling on such motion, the Court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action if: 14 (i) the moving party establishes that, under RCW 4.105.010(2), UPEPA applies, (ii) the 15 responding party fails to establish that, under RCW 4.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(a) — 3 cases
Law Off. Of John Randolph, Pllc V. Ewu Media Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2026). “He includes in his briefing a subheading that “[p]ublic concern is not on appeal.”
Montano v. State of Washington Dep't of Health (W.D. Wash. 2025). “Code 18 § 4.105.010(2)(c). 19 “It is the moving party's burden to establish that UPEPA applies to the cause of action.”
Button (W.D. Wash. 2026).
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(a)(i) — 1 case
Proj. Veritas v. Leland Stanford Junior Univ. (W.D. Wash. 2022). “As is relevant 13 here, in ruling on such motion, the Court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action if: 14 (i) the moving party establishes that, under RCW 4.105.010(2), UPEPA applies, (ii) the 15 responding party fails to establish that, under RCW 4.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(a)(ii) — 1 case
Valve Corp., V. Bucher Law, Pllc Et Ano (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “In ruling on such a motion, “the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action” if three requirements are met: (1) the defendant “establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that [UPEPA] applies”; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under RCW 4.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(a)(iii) — 3 cases
Valve Corp., V. Bucher Law, Pllc Et Ano (Wash. Ct. App. 2025). “In ruling on such a motion, “the court shall dismiss with prejudice a cause of action” if three requirements are met: (1) the defendant “establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that [UPEPA] applies”; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Boshears v. PeopleConnect Inc (W.D. Wash. 2022). “” RCW 4.105.010(3)(a)(iii). 18 Classmates’ argument under UPEPA fails for two reasons.”
TorchStar Corp v. Hyatech Inc (E.D. Wash. 2023). “1 Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010 (2). 2 There are certain exemptions that are enumerated in Wash.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(a)(iv) — 1 case
Kurt Benshoof, V. Nathan Cliber (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “” RCW 4.105.010(2)(a). It does this by allowing parties to bring a special motion for expedited relief “to dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(a)(v) — 1 case
Dimension Townhouses, Llc., V. Leganieds, Llc (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “RCW 4.105.010(2)(b)-(c). Dimension’s tortious interference claim is based on communications made by Leganieds to the City.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(a)(viii) — 1 case
Ligeri v. Parker (W.D. Wash. 2025). “CODE § 4.105.010(2)” that 13 UPEPA applies; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under WASH REV.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(a)(xii) — 1 case
Ligeri v. Parker (W.D. Wash. 2025). “CODE § 4.105.010(2)” that 13 UPEPA applies; (2) the plaintiff “fails to establish under WASH REV.”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.105.010(3)(b)(i) — 1 case
Jeffrey Thurman v. Cowles Co. (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “The court must dismiss the cause of action or part of the cause of action if three conditions are met: (1) the moving party establishes under RCW 4.105.010(2) that the chapter applies, (2) the responding party fails to establish under RCW 4.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the
Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and
treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.