Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 4.44.070 (2026)

Findings and conclusions, how made

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In any case tried upon the facts without a jury or with an advisory jury, any party may, when the evidence is closed, submit distinct and concise proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law. They may be written and handed to the court, or at the option of the court, oral, and entered in the record.

[ 2003 c 406 s 3; Code 1881 s 222; 1877 p 47 s 226; 1869 p 56 s 226; RRS s 341.]

Notes:

Rules of court: Cf. CR 52(a).

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 3 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1999–2024 · leading case: DGHI, Enter. v. Pac. Cities, Inc., 977 P.2d 1231 (Wash. 1999).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

DGHI, Enter. v. Pac. Cities, Inc., 977 P.2d 1231 (Wash. 1999). · cites it 3× “" [50] Under RCW 4.44.070 the prevailing party usually prepares findings of fact and conclusions of law which are then presented to the judge for signature under CR 52(c).”

DGHI Enter. v. Pac. Cities, Inc., 137 Wash. 2d 933 (Wash. 1999). · cites it 3× “” 50 Under RCW 4.44.070 the prevailing party usually prepares findings of fact and conclusions of law which are then presented to the judge for signature under CR 52(c).”

Mike Van Valkenburg, V. Meshesha Tadesse (Wash. Ct. App. 2024). “85281-7-I/15 this argument before the superior court, we decline to address this claim.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.