Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 4.48.080 (2026)

Proceedings on filing of report

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The report of a referee appointed by the court under RCW 4.48.020 shall be filed with the clerk within twenty days after the trial concludes. Either party may, within such time as may be prescribed by the rules of court, or by special order, move to set the same aside, or for judgment thereon, or such order or proceeding as the nature of the case may require.

[ 1984 c 258 s 519; 1957 c 9 s 3; Code 1881 s 255; 1877 p 52 s 259; 1869 p 62 s 259; RRS s 376.]

Notes:

Court Improvement Act of 1984—Effective dates—Severability—Short title—1984 c 258: See notes following RCW 3.30.010.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases (1 in the last 5 years), 1992–2021 · leading case: Barnett v. Hicks, 829 P.2d 1087 (Wash. 1992).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Barnett v. Hicks, 829 P.2d 1087 (Wash. 1992). “RCW 4.48.080, .110. The superior court's powers with respect to each proceeding also differ.”

Covington Land Llc, V. City Of Covington (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 2× “The City also argues that secondary service is not allowable in this context because “personal service on anyone else but those individuals specifically named in RCW 4.48.080(2) is patently insufficient under LUPA.”

— Wash. Rev. Code § 4.48.080(2) — 1 case

Covington Land Llc, V. City Of Covington (Wash. Ct. App. 2021). “The City also argues that secondary service is not allowable in this context because “personal service on anyone else but those individuals specifically named in RCW 4.48.080(2) is patently insufficient under LUPA.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.