Wash. Rev. Code » Title 4 · Chapter 4.84
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 4.84.300 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
The provisions of RCW 4.84.250 through 4.84.290 shall apply regardless of whether the action is commenced in district court or superior court except as provided in RCW 4.84.280. This section shall not be construed as conferring jurisdiction on either court.
[ 1987 c 202 s 123; 1980 c 94 s 4; 1973 c 84 s 6.]

Notes:

Intent—1987 c 202: See note following RCW 2.04.190.
Effective date—1980 c 94: See note following RCW 4.84.250.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 5 cases, 2007–2012 · leading case: Alejandre v. Bull, 153 P.3d 864 (Wash. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Alejandre v. Bull, 153 P.3d 864 (Wash. 2007). “4; see RCW 4.84.300. Accordingly, Ms. Bull is entitled to attorney fees as the prevailing party, at trial, as the trial court ruled, and on appeal and discretionary review, to be awarded pursuant to RAP 18.”
Jackowski v. Borchelt, 151 Wash. App. 1 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “The Jackowskis cite RCW 4.84.300 in support of their request, but not only is this an incorrect citation, it applies only to damage actions of $10,000 or less.”
Jackowski v. Borchelt, 209 P.3d 514 (Wash. Ct. App. 2009). “The Jackowskis cite RCW 4.84.300 in support of their request, but not only is this an incorrect citation, it applies only to damage actions of $10,000 or less.”
Jenbere v. Lassek, 279 P.3d 969 (Wash. Ct. App. 2012). “250 through RCW 4.84.300 of the Revised Code of Washington, if applicable, and hereby offers to allow judgment to be taken in the above matter in the amount of Five Thousand Five Hundred Dollars and 00 cents ($5,500.”
Alejandre v. Bull, 153 P.3d 864 (Wash. 2007). “4; see RCW 4.84.300. Accordingly, Ms. Bull is entitled to attorney fees as the prevailing party, at trial, as the trial court ruled, and on appeal and discretionary review, to be awarded pursuant to RAP 18.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.