Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 41.06.176 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each employee whose work is judged unsatisfactory shall be notified in writing of the areas in which the work is considered deficient. Unless the deficiency is extreme, the employee shall be given an opportunity to demonstrate improvement.

[ 1985 c 461 s 4.]

Notes:

Severability—1985 c 461: See note following RCW 41.06.020.

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases, 1996–2006 · leading case: Herring v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 81 Wash. App. 1 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Herring v. Dep't of Soc. & Health Servs., 81 Wash. App. 1 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996). “That same day, pursuant to RCW 41.06.176 and WAC 356-30-300(6), Turk gave Herring a corrective action plan detailing how he could qualify for permanent employment.”

Herring v. Dept. of Soc. & Health Serv., 914 P.2d 67 (Wash. Ct. App. 1996). “That same day, pursuant to RCW 41.06.176 and WAC 356-30-300(6), Turk gave Herring a corrective action plan detailing how he could qualify for permanent employment.”

Skelly v. Crim. Just. Training Comm'n, 135 Wash. App. 340 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 8× “Each employee whose work is judged unsatisfactory shall be notified in writing of the areas in which the work is considered deficient.”

Skelly v. Crim. Just. Training Com'n, 143 P.3d 871 (Wash. Ct. App. 2006). · cites it 7× “Unless the deficiency is extreme, the employee shall be given an opportunity to demonstrate improvement.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.