Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 41.26.125 (2026)

Retirement for disability not incurred in the line of duty

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
*** CHANGE IN 2026 *** (SEE 2034-S2.SL) ***
Any member, regardless of age or years of service, may be retired by the disability board, subject to approval by the director as provided in this section, for any disability not incurred in the line of duty which has been continuous since discontinuance of service and which renders the member unable to continue service. No disability retirement allowance may be paid until the expiration of a period of six months after the discontinuance of service during which period the member, if found to be physically or mentally unfit for duty by the disability board following receipt of the member's application for disability retirement, shall be granted a disability leave by the disability board and shall receive an allowance equal to the member's full monthly salary and shall continue to receive all other benefits provided to active employees from the member's employer for the period. However, if, at any time during the initial six-month period, the disability board finds the beneficiary is no longer disabled, the disability leave allowance shall be canceled and the member shall be restored to duty in the same rank or position, if any, held by the member at the time the member became disabled. Applications for disability retirement shall be processed in accordance with the following procedures:
(1) Any member who believes he or she is, or is believed to be, physically or mentally disabled shall be examined by such medical authority as the disability board shall employ, upon application of the member, or a person acting in the member's behalf, stating that the member is disabled, either physically or mentally: PROVIDED, That no such application shall be considered unless the member or someone acting in the member's behalf, in case of the incapacity of a member, has filed the application within a period of one year from and after the discontinuance of service of the member.
(2) If the examination shows, to the satisfaction of the disability board, that the member is physically or mentally disabled from the further performance of duty, that such disability was not incurred in the line of duty, and that such disability had been continuous from the discontinuance of service, the disability board shall enter its written decision and order, accompanied by appropriate findings of fact and by conclusions evidencing compliance with this chapter, granting the member a disability retirement allowance. Otherwise, if the member is not found by the disability board to be so disabled, the application shall be denied pursuant to a similar written decision and order, subject to appeal to the director in accordance with RCW 41.26.200: PROVIDED, That in any order granting a nonduty disability retirement allowance, the disability board shall make a finding that the disability was not incurred in the line of duty.
(3) Every order of a disability board granting a nonduty disability retirement allowance shall forthwith be reviewed by the director except the finding that the disability was not incurred in the line of duty. The director may affirm the decision of the disability board or remand the case for further proceedings, or the director may reverse the decision of the disability board if the director finds the disability board's findings, inferences, conclusions, or decisions are:
(a) In violation of constitutional provisions; or
(b) In excess of the statutory authority or jurisdiction of the disability board; or
(c) Made upon unlawful procedure; or
(d) Affected by other error of law; or
(e) Clearly erroneous in view of the entire record as submitted and the public policy contained in this chapter; or
(f) Arbitrary or capricious.
(4) Every member who can establish to the disability board that the member is physically or mentally disabled from the further performance of duty, that such disability was not incurred in the line of duty, and that such disability will be in existence for a period of at least six months, may waive the six-month period of disability leave and be immediately granted a nonduty disability retirement allowance, subject to the approval of the director as provided in subsection (3) of this section.
[ 1986 c 176 s 6; 1985 c 102 s 3.]

Notes:

PurposeRetrospective application1985 c 102: See notes following RCW 41.26.120.
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 8 cases, 1986–2002 · leading case: Arnold v. Dep't of Ret. Sys., 912 P.2d 463 (Wash. 1996).
Arnold v. Dep't of Ret. Sys., 912 P.2d 463 (Wash. 1996). “120 (retirement for disability in the line of duty); RCW 41.26.125 (retirement for disability off duty); RCW 41.”
Moran v. Stowell, 724 P.2d 396 (Wash. Ct. App. 1986). “120 is now limited to retirement for a disability incurred in the line of duty, and retirement for a disability not incurred in the line of duty is now dealt with in the newly enacted RCW 41.26.125. The 1985 act has retrospective application to all disability leave and…”
City of Pasco v. Napier, 755 P.2d 170 (Wash. 1988). “RCW 41.26.125, passed in 1985, is a virtually identical statute covering disabilities not acquired in the line of duty.”
City of Port Orchard v. Dep't of Ret. Sys., 50 P.3d 682 (Wash. Ct. App. 2002). · cites it 4× “) RCW 41.26.125 contains a comparable provision.”
Shurtliff v. Dep't of Ret. Sys., 15 P.3d 164 (Wash. Ct. App. 2000). “120 (retirement for disability in the line of duty); RCW 41.26.125 (retirement for disability off duty); RCW 41.”
Allen v. Thurston Cnty. Fire Prot. Dist. No. 9, 841 P.2d 1265 (Wash. Ct. App. 1992). · cites it 4× “120 or RCW 41.26.125, but the two statutes are essentially the same for purposes of this case.”
Loun v. City of Bremerton, 732 P.2d 1034 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987). · cites it 2× “Randy Loun, a Bremerton police officer, applied for disability retirement in July 1980, pursuant to RCW 41.26.125. The City's disability board ultimately retired him in January 1981, and granted him the 6 months' disability leave contemplated by RCW 41.”
City of Pasco v. Napier, 733 P.2d 994 (Wash. Ct. App. 1987). “RCW 41.26.125. This includes sick leave. Retirement pay is based upon the member's "final average salary" at the time of disability retirement which includes, in addition to active service, periods of "disability leave".”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 41.26.125(2) — 1 case
Allen v. Thurston Cnty. Fire Prot. Dist. No. 9, 841 P.2d 1265 (Wash. Ct. App. 1992). “120 or RCW 41.26.125, but the two statutes are essentially the same for purposes of this case.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.