Wash. Rev. Code » Title 41 · Chapter 41.59
Revised Code of Washington

Wash. Rev. Code § 41.59.110 (2026)

✓ current as of May 2026
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section WA-LEGapp.leg.wa.gov JustiaTitle on Justia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar
(1) The commission shall promulgate, revise, or rescind, in the manner prescribed by the administrative procedure act, chapter 34.05 RCW, such rules and regulations as it may deem necessary and appropriate to administer the provisions of this chapter, in conformity with the intent and purpose of this chapter, and consistent with the best standards of labor-management relations.
(2) The rules, precedents, and practices of the national labor relations board, provided they are consistent with this chapter, shall be considered by the commission in its interpretation of this chapter, and prior to adoption of any aforesaid commission rules and regulations.
[ 1975 1st ex.s. c 288 s 12.]
Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1979–1983 · leading case: State Ex Rel. Graham v. Northshore Sch. Dist. No. 417, 662 P.2d 38 (Wash. 1983).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
State Ex Rel. Graham v. Northshore Sch. Dist. No. 417, 662 P.2d 38 (Wash. 1983). · cites it 2× “59 (RCW 41.59.110(2)), federal authority is persuasive.”
Renton Educ. Ass'n v. Washington State Pub. Emp. Relations Comm'n, 603 P.2d 1271 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). “RCW 41.59.110(2). Since we have decided that the election order was not a final decision subject to judicial review, we do not address the alternate ground for decision urged by PERC and WFT to the effect that REA's failure to serve a copy of the petition for review on WFT…”
— Wash. Rev. Code § 41.59.110(2) — 2 cases
State Ex Rel. Graham v. Northshore Sch. Dist. No. 417, 662 P.2d 38 (Wash. 1983). “59 (RCW 41.59.110(2)), federal authority is persuasive.”
Renton Educ. Ass'n v. Washington State Pub. Emp. Relations Comm'n, 603 P.2d 1271 (Wash. Ct. App. 1979). “RCW 41.59.110(2). Since we have decided that the election order was not a final decision subject to judicial review, we do not address the alternate ground for decision urged by PERC and WFT to the effect that REA's failure to serve a copy of the petition for review on WFT…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.